Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

In article QyRMf.55287$Ug4.52742@dukeread12,
on Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:52:10 -0600,
Dan attempted to say .....

Tank Fixer wrote:
In article ,
on Fri, 24 Feb 2006 04:05:43 GMT,
TRUTH attempted to say .....

You believe a 757 hit the Pentagon when there's no evidence, you must be
talking about yourself.

Not one person has provided proof!

NOTE: a picture of a small non-scorched airplane piece is not proof. It
could have been easily places there by someone.

Maybe that picture I saw of a big honkin airplane engine cover might be proof
enough.


Not to mention any number of people who SAW it hit.


And no one was seen placing airplane parts, some too big for a single
man to carry, at the scene. Now let's sit back and see what his next lie
is

They are amusing.....

--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.