![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om... The other trick is getting the insurance to work. Once you get past the C-172s and get into "regular" GA planes the insurance requirements get pretty specific. Well, you're right it does depend on the insurance policy. But no need to be so pessimistic. Many policies provide for pilots with some minimum experience, rather than requiring all pilots to be named. The pilot themself may not actually be insured, but that's their concern, not the airplane's owner. I've been in this exact situation, and have flown with a pilot with the necessary experience to meet the insurance requirements in my insurance policy, when I was not passenger current. I used the same pilot to act as PIC when I was without my medical a couple of years ago, though in that situation I needed to have him named on the policy temporarily so that I could operate the airplane on the water (my policy only allows non-named pilots to be covered as PIC for land operations). The insurance company was friendly about the whole thing, and added the pilot without any fuss, beyond the phone call to them to ask them to do it. Anyway, your point is a good one, but it shouldn't scare folks off of taking advantage of this particular method for dealing with the "who's PIC" question. Just check the policy, and if necessary contact the insurance company for any clarifications or requests for exceptions. By the way... [...] (all policies will allow a non-named CFI to give instruction to a named). I think if we have learned anything over the years, it's that you cannot make a true general statement like "all policies will allow a non-named CFI to give instruction to a named". At the very least, there may be additional requirements for that non-named CFI spelled out in the policy, and there may well be policies for which even the instructor needs to be named (most likely for the more obscure types, would be my guess). Pete |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message om... "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... The only trick is finding a current pilot who is willing to act as pilot in command without actually touching the controls. The other trick is getting the insurance to work. Once you get past the C-172s and get into "regular" GA planes the insurance requirements get pretty specific. I don't think my insurance co would be too happy if I wasn't current and went up with someone who wasn't named on the policy and not a CFI (all policies will allow a non-named CFI to give instruction to a named). Someone not named or explicitly meeting the open category isn't going to be "covered." However, have you ever read your policy? I see nothing in mine that would limit MY coverage if I brought along a second non-instructor pilot in such a circumstance. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 11:33 AM |
| Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 03:54 AM |
| us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 05:24 AM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |