![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:jHlId.4912$hu.3754@fed1read01... "vincent p. norris" wrote in message ... I typically pull the throttle all the way back to idle about 1/4 mile out, Cessna 172. I suggest that you should not be on final 1/4 mile out. Fly the pattern so you can make the runway from any point on downwind, base, or final, if the engine quits. vince norris Doesn't 500' AGL at 1/4 mile equal a 3 degree glideslope? (6076 / 4) / 500 = 3.038 You don't think you'd hit pavement from 1/4 mile out at 500' AGL? Do you consider 1/4 mile out turning base to final a "bomber pattern." Jay Beckman PP-ASEL Chandler, AZ You can make the runway on a 3° glideslope when deadstick? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:40:33 -0700, "Jay Beckman"
wrote: "vincent p. norris" wrote in message .. . I typically pull the throttle all the way back to idle about 1/4 mile out, Cessna 172. I suggest that you should not be on final 1/4 mile out. Fly the pattern so you can make the runway from any point on downwind, base, or final, if the engine quits. vince norris Doesn't 500' AGL at 1/4 mile equal a 3 degree glideslope? (6076 / 4) / 500 = 3.038 Methinks you forgot to apply the appropriate trigonometric function. What you should have done is: glideslope angle = arctan(rise/run). In this case that would be: glideslope angle = arctan(500/1500) = 18.4 degrees. Pretty steep. ;-) Working it the other way, for a 3 degree glideslope, at 500 ft you'd still be 1.57 nm from the end of the runway. Unless you're flying a glider, you need power to hold a 3 degree glideslope. You don't think you'd hit pavement from 1/4 mile out at 500' AGL? Do you consider 1/4 mile out turning base to final a "bomber pattern." What I enjoy doing is flying downwind about 3/4 mile offset from the runway and if "cleared to land" during the downwind, I go to idle abeam the numbers and fly a circular arc to touchdown. No flaps (don't have any) in an Extra 300L. Drops like a rock. Holding 90 kts to the flare retains plenty of energy for the flare. I'd probably do it differently in a 172. ;-) Klein |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do you consider 1/4 mile out turning base to final a "bomber pattern."
In the Marines, I spent about two years flying an R5C (what the Air Force called a C-46). It was the size of WW II heavy bombers. We routinely flew finals of less than 1/4 mile. In a Cherokee or C-172, two or three hundred yards are plenty. vince norris |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:58:29 -0600, David Gunter
wrote: So what do you do when you are on 1/4-mile final and you spot a coyote or two playing around in the middle of the runway? I'd put on power and go around. I didn't say I switched the engine off, only that I went to idle when abreast the landing spot. We have some (a few) coyotes in SE New Hampshire. When I first saw them, on the ice in the moonlight, I thought they were wolves, one blonde and one dark. Gorgeous animals. Took my breath away. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not to pick nits... but... doesn't an idle engine put out some thrust? I
suspect (please don't hesitate to correct me if I'm full of it... it happens with surprising regularity) that if you're making any kind of a short field landing, you're going to be out of glide range when the engine quits. The best solution is to land at airports with a really nice safety zone before the runway. -Rob "Cub Driver" wrote in message ... On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:58:29 -0600, David Gunter wrote: So what do you do when you are on 1/4-mile final and you spot a coyote or two playing around in the middle of the runway? I'd put on power and go around. I didn't say I switched the engine off, only that I went to idle when abreast the landing spot. We have some (a few) coyotes in SE New Hampshire. When I first saw them, on the ice in the moonlight, I thought they were wolves, one blonde and one dark. Gorgeous animals. Took my breath away. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rob Montgomery wrote:
Not to pick nits... but... doesn't an idle engine put out some thrust? On the ground while taxiing, sure it does, just take your feet off the brakes and away you go. At flying speed however, it (perhaps surprisingly) causes drag. Hilton |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:28:09 -0500, "Rob Montgomery"
wrote: Not to pick nits... but... doesn't an idle engine put out some thrust? I asked my friend/CFI about this. He reckoned that it netted out to about zero, and that I probably wouldn't notice the difference. The only time the plane ever moved when the engine was at idle was on glare ice. Then it taxied so fast that the only way I could negotiate the turns (race-track oval plowed out) was to switch to right magneto, the one that shows the greater drop. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, that's true, and it's why the Old Timers taught power-off
landings, and it's why I fly them routinely. (To tell the truth, I also like the feeling of whooshing down without that engine blatting away. Perhaps I was a glider pilot in another life.) -- all the best, Dan Ford Dan, when I was flying those Cubs at your place.. I was taught that in winter it is best to keep some power up.. letting it idle would cool those cylinders and the spark could go out.. but a J-3 should never fly a pattern outside of power off glide anyway. I've seen the spark go out when idling on the ground in cold weather. BT |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:02:10 -0800, "BTIZ"
wrote: Dan, when I was flying those Cubs at your place.. I was taught that in winter it is best to keep some power up.. letting it idle would cool those cylinders and the spark could go out.. but a J-3 should never fly a pattern outside of power off glide anyway. I've seen the spark go out when idling on the ground in cold weather. When 80 octane became impossible to get, the airport got STCs for the Cubs and brought in mogas from a supplier in Maine (no MBTE or alcohol). By coincidence or not, we experienced a rash of engine quitting in cold weather. Generally of course this was on the ground, but even that can be awkward if it's at another airport--nobody wants to be involved with propping a Cub any longer. But it happened to an instructor while doing stall training with a student, very bad. (He started the engine again by diving the Cub.) So the rule came in: we can't rent the planes unless the thermometer is over 20 degrees. (They also pulled the STCs and placarded the Cubs for 100LL only. There's one school of thought that holds that this was less because of engines quitting than because one instructor didn't like the smell of mogas.) Anyhow, it's very unlikely that an engine will quit in the pattern, until you flare. That's my conclusion from that winter's flying. (That is: quit because it's at idle and not at 1500 rpm.) -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cub Driver wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:56:22 -0800, Ron Garret wrote: If you fly final with some amount of power (which I gather most people do -- I always have) that seems to guarantee that if you lose your engine on final you will land short, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it. Is that true? Yes, that's true, and it's why the Old Timers taught power-off landings, and it's why I fly them routinely. (To tell the truth, I also like the feeling of whooshing down without that engine blatting away. Perhaps I was a glider pilot in another life.) You've got it in one Dan ! Every landing in a glider/sailplane is a forced landing and circuit planning becomes nearly automatic. However with all the posters talk of glideslopes and rates of descent and other esoteric subjects remember there are two laws a pilot has to follow. 1) Fly the aeroplane 2) For anything else refer to 1 :-) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Cleared Straight-In Runway X; Report Y Miles Final" | Jim Cummiskey | Piloting | 86 | August 16th 04 07:23 PM |
| Diesel engine | Bryan | Home Built | 41 | May 1st 04 08:23 PM |
| Night engine failure in Boston | Dan Luke | Piloting | 8 | February 13th 04 06:33 AM |
| Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 05:09 PM |
| Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 05:29 AM |