A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

interstate runnways?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 13th 05, 11:45 PM
zaphod
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

this group never ceases to amaze me. THANKS GUYS!

  #2  
Old June 14th 05, 01:32 AM
Ronald Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In the cold war days and the start of the interstate system, the plan was to
use these areas as a remote deployment site for the military aircraft in the
event of an attack.

zaphod wrote:

OK, This sounded a little strange to me, but during lunch today with some
co-workers, someone asked if I knew of some rules regarding interstate
construction. They had heard a bit of trivia that claimed that an
interstate highway must have sections that are straight, level, and long
enough for a plane to land(at least 1 mile they thought.) I had never
heard of such and was wondering if anyone here knows what they were talking
about?

c


  #3  
Old June 14th 05, 05:54 PM
Ash Wyllie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ronald Gardner opined

In the cold war days and the start of the interstate system, the plan was to
use these areas as a remote deployment site for the military aircraft in the
event of an attack.


And built into every under/overpass was to be a fallout shelter. As far as I
know, only a demo shelter was evre built.

Ike sold the Interstate Highways as a national defence thing.

zaphod wrote:


OK, This sounded a little strange to me, but during lunch today with some
co-workers, someone asked if I knew of some rules regarding interstate
construction. They had heard a bit of trivia that claimed that an
interstate highway must have sections that are straight, level, and long
enough for a plane to land(at least 1 mile they thought.) I had never
heard of such and was wondering if anyone here knows what they were talking
about?

c




-ash
Cthulhu in 2005!
Why wait for nature?

  #4  
Old June 14th 05, 05:29 PM
John Gaquin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ash Wyllie" wrote in message

Ike sold the Interstate Highways as a national defence thing.


As was right. One thing learned VERY quickly during the mobilization for
WWII was the inefficiency of the logistical/distribution system in the US on
a national scale. Railroads alone, while they did a marvelous job, just
couldn't keep up. The country up to then was a huge group of local/regional
units. The Interstate system was conceived and built for
commercial/military trucking and transport. Any other benefit, like
personal travel, was ancillary.


  #5  
Old June 16th 05, 12:11 AM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...

"Ash Wyllie" wrote in message

Ike sold the Interstate Highways as a national defence thing.


As was right. One thing learned VERY quickly during the mobilization for WWII was the inefficiency of the
logistical/distribution system in the US on a national scale. Railroads alone, while they did a marvelous job, just
couldn't keep up. The country up to then was a huge group of local/regional units. The Interstate system was
conceived and built for commercial/military trucking and transport. Any other benefit, like personal travel, was
ancillary.



And the legends live on....


  #6  
Old June 14th 05, 12:28 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:51:34 GMT, zaphod wrote:

OK, This sounded a little strange to me, but during lunch today with some
co-workers, someone asked if I knew of some rules regarding interstate
construction. They had heard a bit of trivia that claimed that an
interstate highway must have sections that are straight, level, and long
enough for a plane to land(at least 1 mile they thought.) I had never
heard of such and was wondering if anyone here knows what they were talking
about?


I have heard something similar. Recall that the interstates were sold
to Congress in the 1950s as the National Defense Highway system. I
believe it was argued that they could be used to disperse the SAC
fleet in time of war. I have no reference to this; it's just something
I recall.


-- all the best, Dan Ford

email (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum:
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
the blog: www.danford.net
In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com
  #7  
Old June 14th 05, 02:57 PM
James
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



zaphod wrote:

OK, This sounded a little strange to me, but during lunch today with some
co-workers, someone asked if I knew of some rules regarding interstate
construction. They had heard a bit of trivia that claimed that an
interstate highway must have sections that are straight, level, and long
enough for a plane to land(at least 1 mile they thought.) I had never
heard of such and was wondering if anyone here knows what they were talking
about?

c

Go to Australia and drive from Adelaide to Perth, and you will find 3
emergency runnways marked on highway 1 for the Royal Flying Doctor to
use. They are a few hundred miles apart between Ceduna and Norseman.
  #8  
Old June 14th 05, 05:49 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , zaphod writes:
OK, This sounded a little strange to me, but during lunch today with some
co-workers, someone asked if I knew of some rules regarding interstate
construction. They had heard a bit of trivia that claimed that an
interstate highway must have sections that are straight, level, and long
enough for a plane to land(at least 1 mile they thought.) I had never
heard of such and was wondering if anyone here knows what they were talking
about?


This gets debated fairly often, concensus is that it is an urban legend,
atleast in the States.

A repeating vector for this UL is provided by a guy from Harvard named
John Stilgoe, a "professor of ordinary things around us". He has several
times stated that not only are they designed for landings, but that SAC
often practices B-52 landings on Interstates - a notion richly poo-pooed
by folks who are in the know regarding all things SAC and B-52
.. He has stated this in an article in the "Smithsonian" a few years back,
and also on an interview done by National Publice Radio.

The date of the NPR show was July 2 1998. It was available in Real Audio format
at www.npr.org, the segment titled "Outside Magic", don't know if it's
still there.


  #10  
Old June 15th 05, 08:14 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"john smith" wrote

I have yet to see a segment of an interstate highway that is wide enough
for the outriggers of a B-52.


You must have been asleep in class, on that day.

The outriggers ride on the highway, themselves. They have to put turf tires
on the mains, for use in the medians.

g
--
Jim in NC

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interstate 81 Information Ryan Piloting 0 July 20th 04 09:08 PM
Interstate Aviation and Moyer Aviation G.R. Patterson III Owning 2 June 19th 04 06:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.