![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob Noel" wrote in message
... 1) the DC ADIZ isn't new is it? It isn't the only ADIZ, is it? It's not actually an ADIZ. It has the same name, using the same acronym, but the rules are substantially different from the true ADIZ airspace. 2) Given that I've worked on USAF Air Defense systems, including stuff in the NCR, I better know the purpose of the DC ADIZ. Okay. So, do you? Know the purpose of the DC ADIZ, that is. And note that I've never ever said having an ADIZ over/around DC is necessary. That's a relief. ![]() Pete |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:45:30 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote in _b8Ce.156431$x96.114510@attbi_s72:: But if there really are that many, I'm afraid this says volumes more about the caliber of our pilots than it does about the utility of an ADIZ. Admittedly, there is adequate human incompetence in any group you care to name to assure that some errors will occur. But restricting 2,000 square miles of some of the busiest airspace in the entire world is guaranteed to trap even competent airmen. To expect an invisible 100 mile (?) perimeter boundary to preclude accidental incursions is absurd. Add to that the lack of surface landmarks to mark the boundary, the obscuration of weather, night time operations, and the inevitable ATC errors, and the volume of inadvertent DC ADIZ incursions isn't so unreasonable. Airing disparaging sentiment toward our ranks, while perhaps lending a bit of public credibility to your arguments, does a disservice to our fellows at a time when solidarity is crucial. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:29:41 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote in :: do you? Know the purpose of the DC ADIZ My guess at the ostensible purpose of the DC ADIZ would be, to provide uncluttered buffer space from the ground based missile batteries (located at its center within the FRZ) in which to determine if the aircraft in violation of the ADIZ regulations is friend or foe before needlessly shooting down innocent citizens. Anyone who knows anything about security, knows that only completely locked (and thus unusable) systems are even remotely invulnerable. While possibly attempted with the best of intentions, the security measures implemented since September 11, 2001 only serve to confound those with no criminal intent, and bear piteous testament to the impossibility of securing a free populace. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Peter Duniho" wrote: [...] Maybe we really aren't as good as we think? I have always questioned the attitude that pilots are somehow better than the rest of the world. There are some differences, to be sure...the certification process eliminates people who are not fully committed. But it does nothing to eliminate the idiots. There are some drivers I know that are downright scary. I hope the certification process would eliminate some of those from actually getting a certificate. I mean, come on, there are folks I know that could hide their own easter eggs, and these people are driving! -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Peter Duniho" wrote: 2) Given that I've worked on USAF Air Defense systems, including stuff in the NCR, I better know the purpose of the DC ADIZ. Okay. So, do you? Know the purpose of the DC ADIZ, that is. yep. Already said it a couple of posts ago. That's not to say there aren't side effects or that it is properly set up for its purpose. But it's there to help the air defense folks responsible for the NCR separate friend from foe. -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
I forgot to mention in my original post that in this program
was plenty of video demonstrating the laser warning system. In the night footage the waring flashes were very clear. However, in the daylight footage it was hard to spot. It just didn't appear to stand out all that much. I would venture to say that if someone was looking 90 degrees away from the laser they wouldn't even notice it in the daytime. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Blog: http://www.skywise711.com/Blog Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "Peter Duniho" wrote: 2) Given that I've worked on USAF Air Defense systems, including stuff in the NCR, I better know the purpose of the DC ADIZ. Okay. So, do you? Know the purpose of the DC ADIZ, that is. yep. Already said it a couple of posts ago. That's not to say there aren't side effects or that it is properly set up for its purpose. But it's there to help the air defense folks responsible for the NCR separate friend from foe. -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule How are the friendly trucks separated from the foes? |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Skywise" wrote in message ... I forgot to mention in my original post that in this program was plenty of video demonstrating the laser warning system. In the night footage the waring flashes were very clear. However, in the daylight footage it was hard to spot. It just didn't appear to stand out all that much. I would venture to say that if someone was looking 90 degrees away from the laser they wouldn't even notice it in the daytime. Brian -- All this is based on the assumption that the ADIZ is a valid premise anyway |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
" Blueskies" wrote: How are the friendly trucks separated from the foes? good question (but making that determination is not the responsibility of the Air Defense folks in the NCR). -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Larry Dighera wrote:
How can you be so sure that the ADIZ isn't a typically poorly thought out, airline industry inspired, TSA pseudo-security measure to provide the public with tangible evidence that the TSA are earning their pay, and the military with additional stateside operational duty? You can't; however, NPR broadcast a discussion of security measures back when the results of the 9/11 commission were made public. One of the officials interviewed stated that "they" had been agitating for the equivalent of this ADIZ for many years and that one of the "good things" about the terrorist situation is that "no-one can seriously argue any more that the ADIZ isn't necessary." I'm afraid I no longer remember who made that comment, but I believe it was a military officer. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Rec.Aviation FRS Channel @ Oshkosh this year? | Bob Chilcoat | Home Built | 25 | June 20th 05 11:07 PM |
| A Rec.Aviation FRS Channel @ Oshkosh this year? | Bob Chilcoat | Owning | 10 | June 19th 05 04:32 PM |
| A Rec.Aviation FRS Channel @ Oshkosh this year? | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 10 | June 19th 05 04:32 PM |
| Another expensive annual this year | [email protected] | Owning | 49 | January 30th 05 08:46 AM |
| bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 05:26 PM |