A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

death of GA in NY



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 12th 05, 09:01 PM
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How much money do you think we have paid to bail out TWA, Continental,
United etc...?

  #2  
Old September 12th 05, 09:22 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 12 Sep 2005 12:01:18 -0700, "Andrew Sarangan"
wrote in . com::

How much money do you think we have paid to bail out TWA, Continental,
United etc...?


Oh, you mean like federalizing the security screeners, and paying
billions to the families of 9/11 victims in exchange for their
forfeiting their right to sue the airlines, or the direct subsidies?

  #3  
Old September 12th 05, 10:08 PM
Jonathan Goodish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote:
How much money do you think we have paid to bail out TWA, Continental,
United etc...?


Oh, you mean like federalizing the security screeners, and paying
billions to the families of 9/11 victims in exchange for their
forfeiting their right to sue the airlines, or the direct subsidies?


No, he probably means the huge "get out of jail free" fund that the
federal government made available to companies that are so mismanaged
that they have no business being in business.



JKG
  #4  
Old September 13th 05, 03:21 AM
cjcampbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Skylune wrote:
Probably just the useless, recreational form of GA is dying for economic
reasons. And this is before the user fees are enacted! Outstanding!

Part of the reason that user fees are inevitable is because commercial
aviation is tired of subsidizing small planes.


Yeah, yeah. And motorists are tired of 'subsidizing' bicyclists. City
dwellers are tired of 'subsidizing' the national parks. Small
businesses are tired of 'subsidizing' giant corporations, who believe
they are 'subsidizing' the small buinesses. And we are all tired of
'subsidizing' the farmers.

Get a clue. Everyone pays taxes. The method of collecting taxes is
meaningless. It all goes into one big pot anyway. No one is
'subsidizing' anyone else. Just because the government, in its infinite
mercy, chooses to let you keep some small part of your own money does
not mean that you are subsidizing anyone. Be sure that they are getting
their share, well, more than their share, actually, of your hide from
somewhere else.

  #5  
Old September 12th 05, 10:08 PM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
...

The slow death of GA is in acceleration in the NY area. TEB FBO's moving
out pushing the feeding chain down. FBO's now requiring TSA clearance
even for renters (not just trainees as required by law; since when did
FBO's become worse than homeland security?).

FBO's outside of TEB losing students by the dozens due to fuel and the 3rd
price hike in less than a month.

Nice going everyone. I always thought what would finally kill GA would be
the media or anti airport sentiment; not FBO's. There is not one that I
would recommend within 25 miles of new york city.

And .. if you respond and defend an FBO here I can only wonder why.


I know you think the world revolves around NY, but there are many more
airfields and airplanes outside the NYC area that will continue, dispite any
cease in GA around the big apple.

Since I rarely ever even file a flight plan, I'm not too concerned about
user fees either.


  #6  
Old September 12th 05, 10:38 PM
Skylune
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Read the "Fuel Price Affect" (sic) posted on the AOPA member board (easy to
hack into their site if you are not a member; I-pilot is a bit tougher,
but doable): Rising AV gas prices are definitely having an "affect."

  #7  
Old September 12th 05, 11:20 PM
Steve Foley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't think fuel prices will have a permanant effect. How many gallons of
fuel could you buy for the same as a new Skyhawk on 1970? How about now?

I would guess that consumption in every recreational activity that burns
petrolium fuel is is down. How much gas did you burn in those twin 350s this
weekend? It looked to me that boating was way off this weekend.

"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com...
Read the "Fuel Price Affect" (sic) posted on the AOPA member board (easy

to
hack into their site if you are not a member; I-pilot is a bit tougher,
but doable): Rising AV gas prices are definitely having an "affect."



  #8  
Old September 13th 05, 04:59 PM
Skylune
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Given the clear weather and the (odd) northeasterly wind, I travelled a bit
farther out of the Peconic than I normally would have. Got some shelter
around Southhold bay, about 8 nm from the marina. Total travel time, each
way, about 25 minutes. So, say about an hour of travel time, at about 15
gph. We spent about 6 hours on the water, and several more at the dock.

  #9  
Old September 13th 05, 08:20 PM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article
outaviation.com,
"Skylune" wrote:

Given the clear weather and the (odd) northeasterly wind, I travelled a bit
farther out of the Peconic than I normally would have. Got some shelter
around Southhold bay, about 8 nm from the marina. Total travel time, each
way, about 25 minutes. So, say about an hour of travel time, at about 15
gph. We spent about 6 hours on the water, and several more at the dock.



I forgot to include boaters and their marinas and Coast Guard protection
to my list of "subsidies of recreational activities."

Get a clue, "Skylune," you hypocrite!
  #10  
Old September 14th 05, 03:47 AM
Steve Foley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think your travel time was more than one hour. Cow Hampshire to Lon
Gisland is a heck of a drive. You should take up flying


"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com...
Given the clear weather and the (odd) northeasterly wind, I travelled a

bit
farther out of the Peconic than I normally would have. Got some shelter
around Southhold bay, about 8 nm from the marina. Total travel time, each
way, about 25 minutes. So, say about an hour of travel time, at about 15
gph. We spent about 6 hours on the water, and several more at the dock.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Death toll now 10 times 9/11 X98 Military Aviation 9 June 11th 04 06:23 AM
~ US JOINS CHINA & IRAN AS TOP DEATH PENALTY USERS ~ Matt Wiser Military Aviation 0 April 8th 04 03:55 PM
About death threats and other Usenet potpourri :-) Dudley Henriques Military Aviation 4 December 23rd 03 08:16 AM
"Air Force rules out death in spy case" Mike Yared Military Aviation 5 November 10th 03 08:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.