A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dress Code



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 21st 06, 07:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Dress Code

LWG writes:

Don't have personal knowledge about private pilots, but I remember being
astonished to see the ski lift attendants wearing impeccable uniforms in
Austria a number of years ago. I think some sort of convention of dress adds
to respect (and yes, I have been following the thread and understand the
point that we rarely see controllers.)


Dress is often used to hide incompetence.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old September 21st 06, 01:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
B A R R Y[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 178
Default Dress Code

Mxsmanic wrote:

Dress is often used to hide incompetence.


Is that why France considers itself the fashion hub of the world?
  #3  
Old September 20th 06, 01:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
mike regish
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 438
Default Dress Code

This is kind of frightening...

mike

"Newps" wrote in message
. ..
http://vanityfairmusings.blogspot.co...n-hall-of.html



  #4  
Old September 20th 06, 02:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default Dress Code

http://vanityfairmusings.blogspot.co...n-hall-of.html

My God. I had no idea the FAA was so controlled by their union that
they feel they must put up with this sort of thing. Imagine -- they've
got a current employee, on staff, who runs a website solely for the
purposes of impugning his employer!

And what a fool. He has neatly and succinctly documented his own
insubordination. Snidely referring to the company CEO as "Maid
Marion?" Documenting the insubordination of his fellow employees in a
photographic record, and publishing it worldwide?

In the real world (meaning anything outside of our totally screwed up
government) his career would be measured in nanoseconds.

My respect for controllers could not have been more diminished. Quite
frankly, after many years of holding the FAA in the highest regard, I
now must admit that I've never seen an organization with a more
self-destructive workforce in my life -- and I've worked for some very
large, very dumb corporations. If any further evidence of the need to
privatize the FAA is necessary, I will be very surprised.

What a shame.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #5  
Old September 20th 06, 02:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Dress Code


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...

My respect for controllers could not have been more diminished. Quite
frankly, after many years of holding the FAA in the highest regard, I
now must admit that I've never seen an organization with a more
self-destructive workforce in my life -- and I've worked for some very
large, very dumb corporations. If any further evidence of the need to
privatize the FAA is necessary, I will be very surprised.


Who do you think you're kidding?


  #6  
Old September 20th 06, 04:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default Dress Code

My respect for controllers could not have been more diminished. Quite
frankly, after many years of holding the FAA in the highest regard, I
now must admit that I've never seen an organization with a more
self-destructive workforce in my life -- and I've worked for some very
large, very dumb corporations. If any further evidence of the need to
privatize the FAA is necessary, I will be very surprised.


Who do you think you're kidding?


If you mean about my respect for the FAA, I'm not kidding. I always
thought the FAA was a bit uptight and anal about certain regulatory
things (okay, a LOT uptight), but I never had any reason to disrespect
the individuals who made up the FAA. To a man, they've always been
smart, kind, and professional.

That has changed.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #7  
Old September 21st 06, 01:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Dress Code


"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
ps.com...

If you mean about my respect for the FAA, I'm not kidding. I always
thought the FAA was a bit uptight and anal about certain regulatory
things (okay, a LOT uptight), but I never had any reason to disrespect
the individuals who made up the FAA. To a man, they've always been
smart, kind, and professional.

That has changed.


The individuals who make up the FAA are government employees. You have
clearly stated your disdain for government employees more than once in these
forums.


  #8  
Old September 21st 06, 07:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default Dress Code

The individuals who make up the FAA are government employees. You have
clearly stated your disdain for government employees more than once in these
forums.


My belief that most federal employees are underworked and overpaid is
not "disdain". It is something, however, that could be easily and
swiftly addressed, under any new administration.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #9  
Old September 20th 06, 06:33 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Gary Drescher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Dress Code

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...
http://vanityfairmusings.blogspot.co...n-hall-of.html


My God. I had no idea the FAA was so controlled by their union that
they feel they must put up with this sort of thing. Imagine -- they've
got a current employee, on staff, who runs a website solely for the
purposes of impugning his employer!


Yes, what an indignity: a government agency forced to respect employees'
right to criticize the government. That certainly shows how evil unions are.

--Gary


  #10  
Old September 20th 06, 11:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default Dress Code

Yes, what an indignity: a government agency forced to respect employees'
right to criticize the government. That certainly shows how evil unions are.


They're not criticizing the "government" -- that is every Amercan's
right. They *are* openly slandering their *employer* -- and in the
real world that should be a one-way trip to the unemployment line.

Of course, since the FAA is only playing with "pretend" money -- our
taxes -- it is apparently just fine that the inmates are running the
asylum. Unbelievable.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 07:58 PM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 01:56 AM
Run up for plug clearing Roger Long Piloting 78 October 18th 04 04:39 AM
Winscore source code now available Guy Byars Soaring 0 February 5th 04 11:43 AM
Need Help with Northstar M1 Loran Jerald Malin Owning 4 December 8th 03 06:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.