![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The FAA removes the ID when the radio facility is out of
tolerance and "not in service" even though there may be a signal being broadcast [maybe part of testing or trouble shooting/repair] so it is my practice to have the audio on at low volume. The monitoring decoding by the hardware is very nice. AIM 1-1-3 c. The only positive method of identifying a VOR is by its Morse Code identification or by the recorded automatic voice identification which is always indicated by use of the word "VOR" following the range's name. Reliance on determining the identification of an omnirange should never be placed on listening to voice transmissions by the Flight Service Station (FSS) (or approach control facility) involved. Many FSSs remotely operate several omniranges with different names. In some cases, none of the VORs have the name of the "parent" FSS. During periods of maintenance, the facility may radiate a T-E-S-T code (- · ··· -) or the code may be removed 1-1-12. NAVAID Identifier Removal During Maintenance During periods of routine or emergency maintenance, coded identification (or code and voice, where applicable) is removed from certain FAA NAVAIDs. Removal of identification serves as a warning to pilots that the facility is officially off the air for tune-up or repair and may be unreliable even though intermittent or constant signals are received. NOTE- During periods of maintenance VHF ranges may radiate a T-E-S-T code (- l l l l -). NOTE- DO NOT attempt to fly a procedure that is NOTAMed out of service even if the identification is present. In certain cases, the identification may be transmitted for short periods as part of the testing. "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... | Anyone have a reference for a requirement to identify an ils or vor | prior to it's use in the USA? | | | 91.3? | | -- | Thomas Borchert (EDDH) | |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Macklin wrote:
The FAA removes the ID when the radio facility is out of tolerance and "not in service" even though there may be a signal being broadcast [maybe part of testing or trouble shooting/repair] so it is my practice to have the audio on at low volume. The monitoring decoding by the hardware is very nice. The TEST case brings to mind an amusing story. I was in the backseat while my wife and her instructor were flying around trying to track the EMI VOR. They had the IDENT volume up so I could hear it sending. I finally had pity on them and let them know it was sending TEST. Shame on Margy, she's a HAM radio operator from the days when she had to copy CW at more than twice the rate the VOR sends to get her license. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ron Natalie wrote:
Jim Macklin wrote: The FAA removes the ID when the radio facility is out of tolerance and "not in service" even though there may be a signal being broadcast [maybe part of testing or trouble shooting/repair] so it is my practice to have the audio on at low volume. The monitoring decoding by the hardware is very nice. The TEST case brings to mind an amusing story. I was in the backseat while my wife and her instructor were flying around trying to track the EMI VOR. They had the IDENT volume up so I could hear it sending. I finally had pity on them and let them know it was sending TEST. Shame on Margy, she's a HAM radio operator from the days when she had to copy CW at more than twice the rate the VOR sends to get her license. But just that's the problem - the ID's are so slow that the thoughts slip to something else before decoding the code. When you're really good with Morse, the slow speeds with proper spacing start to be difficult to listen to. -- Tauno Voipio (CPL(a), also OH2UG) tauno voipio (at) iki fi |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Instrument rating PTS in section VI.B - (Precision approaches)
says: "9. Selects, tunes, identifies, and monitors the operational status of ground and airplane navigation equipment used for the approach." So at least on checkrides you have a reference... Ed |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 5, 12:25 am, "Jim Macklin"
wrote: The FAA removes the ID when the radio facility is out of tolerance and "not in service" Perhaps the FAA does. Here is a fun video of an aborted landing in Apia Samoa. This video describes the post analysis of an avoided accident. Apparently, there is a maintenance mode (control monitor bypass mode) of an ILS glide slope transmitter. In this mode, any GS receiver tuned to that ILS will immediately conclude an on-glide slope condition. Regardless of position! The ident, of course, only indicates a functioning localizer. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GelRBhJ4gmI ak. |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A-4F cockpit, sans seat | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 1 | March 2nd 07 03:13 PM |
| antenna identification | Matt Whiting | Piloting | 10 | December 30th 06 04:47 AM |
| Identification test | Rich S. | Home Built | 7 | June 11th 06 09:00 AM |
| Does anybody know a link to a real picture of the X-43 in flight sans Pegasus or better yet a video clip of the flight? | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 0 | April 3rd 04 09:47 PM |