Other 9/11 anniversary

"Brian Allardice" wrote in message
. ca...
In article ,
says...

Anyone else noticed the odd coincidence of the NYC atrocity with
Amerikkka's
cynical destruction of Chile's elected government to be replaced by
military
dictatorship?

Also the toll there was around 3,000.... Karma, man, karma........

Only 3000 died in Chile during the CIA coup and subsequent generation-long
military dictatorship? Seems on the low side to me. Hmmm.

Karma is right I suppose.

John

"John Mullen" wrote in message
...
"Brian Allardice" wrote in message
. ca...
In article ,

says...

Anyone else noticed the odd coincidence of the NYC atrocity with
Amerikkka's
cynical destruction of Chile's elected government to be replaced by
military
dictatorship?

Also the toll there was around 3,000.... Karma, man, karma........

Only 3000 died in Chile during the CIA coup and subsequent generation-long
military dictatorship? Seems on the low side to me. Hmmm.

BBC site gives 3000 for the death toll *during the CIA coup itself*.

http://www.memoriaviva.com/Desaparecidos/list.htm

gives a list of 1197 named 'disappeared' people during Pinochet's vile
reign, which, let's repeat it, only happened because

"The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to
decide for themselves."

"I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to
the irresponsibility of its people."

(both from good ole Henry Kissinger, though you could be forgiven for
suspecting they would be from someone wearing a Hakenkreuz!)

http://www.trentu.ca/~mneumann/pinochet.html gives some specimens of his
malodorous regime's US-supported torture activities. Not for the
faint-hearted.

Personally I suspect you might well be able to add a zero to that 3000
figure but I haven't been able to find anything authoritative. Maybe nobody
knows. Sad.

John

If Mr Mullen is so cutesy-smart, perhaps he can explain why 3000-plus
perishing in the avoidance of (yet another) Leftist totalitarian country
are not an acceptable tradeoff for the 100,000,000 or so who have died
under Communist control. Especially since those who went by the board
in Chile were Communists, fellow travelers, pre-Sandalistas, and
intelligence operatives from Cuba or the USSR. Like we've some
especially troubling shortage of the intellectual idiots who support
Leftish policy -- even at this late date.

John Mullen wrote:
"John Mullen" wrote in message
...

"Brian Allardice" wrote in message
w.ca...

In article ,



says...

Anyone else noticed the odd coincidence of the NYC atrocity with

Amerikkka's

cynical destruction of Chile's elected government to be replaced by

military

dictatorship?

Also the toll there was around 3,000.... Karma, man, karma........

Only 3000 died in Chile during the CIA coup and subsequent generation-long
military dictatorship? Seems on the low side to me. Hmmm.


BBC site gives 3000 for the death toll *during the CIA coup itself*.

http://www.memoriaviva.com/Desaparecidos/list.htm

gives a list of 1197 named 'disappeared' people during Pinochet's vile
reign, which, let's repeat it, only happened because

"The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to
decide for themselves."

"I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to
the irresponsibility of its people."

(both from good ole Henry Kissinger, though you could be forgiven for
suspecting they would be from someone wearing a Hakenkreuz!)

http://www.trentu.ca/~mneumann/pinochet.html gives some specimens of his
malodorous regime's US-supported torture activities. Not for the
faint-hearted.

Personally I suspect you might well be able to add a zero to that 3000
figure but I haven't been able to find anything authoritative. Maybe nobody
knows. Sad.

John

On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:56:30 -0600, sddso wrote:

If Mr Mullen is so cutesy-smart, perhaps he can explain why 3000-plus
perishing in the avoidance of (yet another) Leftist totalitarian country
are not an acceptable tradeoff for the 100,000,000 or so who have died
under Communist control. Especially since those who went by the board
in Chile were Communists, fellow travelers, pre-Sandalistas, and
intelligence operatives from Cuba or the USSR. Like we've some
especially troubling shortage of the intellectual idiots who support
Leftish policy -- even at this late date.

Time to crank up the power qt the naval WT station in Alaska
to zap all those intellectual commie *******s before they are
conceived. (for the comfort of the pro-life movement).

--
Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com

sddso wrote in message ...
If Mr Mullen is so cutesy-smart, perhaps he can explain why 3000-plus
perishing in the avoidance of (yet another) Leftist totalitarian country
are not an acceptable tradeoff for the 100,000,000 or so who have died
under Communist control. Especially since those who went by the board
in Chile were Communists, fellow travelers, pre-Sandalistas, and
intelligence operatives from Cuba or the USSR. Like we've some
especially troubling shortage of the intellectual idiots who support
Leftish policy -- even at this late date.

Mr. Mullen is not really all that smart, since he appears to be
a politician. Whom we have to explain once per day to their
zero-IQ minds, that there is no such thing as an elected
government. There are elected politicians, with their moronic
South American Goverments, retarted German ships, decrepit
Pisan Lean-To's, and loser Cuban baseball teams. And then there
are people with brains, guns, money, jobs, moon rockets,
Winter Olympic Teams that can actually operate a Bob Sled,
and Panama Canals.

In article ,
says...

Anyone else noticed the odd coincidence of the NYC atrocity with
Amerikkka's
cynical destruction of Chile's elected government to be replaced by
military
dictatorship?


yes, but i thought that this ng would pay more attention to the
crossing of the german border by the western allies on 9-11-44.

there is, after all, a 1 in 365.24 chance that any event in the past
happened on a september 11.

In message , wrote:
In article ,

says...

Anyone else noticed the odd coincidence of the NYC atrocity with
Amerikkka's
cynical destruction of Chile's elected government to be replaced by
military
dictatorship?


yes, but i thought that this ng would pay more attention to the
crossing of the german border by the western allies on 9-11-44.

Hmmm, when I saw "Other 9/11 anniversary" I thought it was a reference to the
Battle of the Brandywine.

g


--
Regards,

Michael P. Reed

yes, but i thought that this ng would pay more attention to the
crossing of the german border by the western allies on 9-11-44.

Hmmm, when I saw "Other 9/11 anniversary" I thought it was a reference to the
Battle of the Brandywine.

There's a party trick based on the odds that if there are twenty
people in a room, two of them will share the same birthday. The same
of course is true of anniversaries. Still, for any American alive in
1941, there is only one December 7, and for any American alive in
2001, only one September 11.

One of my September rituals is to fly "around the mountains", a very
pretty trip. That's what I was doing on 9/11/01 when I was so rudely
interrupted www.warbirdforum.com/defcon.htm

I tried to finish the trip last September but the weather didn't
cooperate. Yesterday was just grand: sunny, no wind, just some mist in
the valleys that cleared off while I was refueling at Moultonborough
(where I got stuck two years ago).

The only sour note was when driving home I realized that the flags
were at half-staff. I didn't care for that. Crikey, it wasn't a
traffic accident! We didn't lower the flags on 12/7/43.

And those who died at Pearl Harbor, Clark Field, etc., didn't spend
the second anniversary filing lawsuits against Tojo, the Emperor,
Curtiss-Wright, and Mitsubishi.



all the best -- Dan Ford
email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9

see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com

"John Mullen" wrote in message
...
Anyone else noticed the odd coincidence of the NYC atrocity with
Amerikkka's
cynical destruction of Chile's elected government to be replaced by
military
dictatorship?

So, are you trying to claim that ****ed of Chileans were behind 911, and not
****ed off Saudis? And I do hope you weren't a fan of Maggie Thatcher, who
was actually buddies with Pinochet.

tim gueguen 101867

"tim gueguen" wrote in message
. ca...

"John Mullen" wrote in message
...
Anyone else noticed the odd coincidence of the NYC atrocity with
Amerikkka's
cynical destruction of Chile's elected government to be replaced by
military
dictatorship?

So, are you trying to claim that ****ed of Chileans were behind 911, and
not
****ed off Saudis?

Nah, looks like it would have been Arabian anti-Saudis right enough. Nothing
(of course) to do with Iraq.

And I do hope you weren't a fan of Maggie Thatcher, who
was actually buddies with Pinochet.

I never liked either of them, although in a way they were made for each
other. Thatch sucked up to Pinochet who she had a natural soft spot for as a
fellow right-wing dictator, as he was and she no doubt fantasised about
being. He paid back the favour by 'helping' the UK in the Falklands in 82.
And she tried to rerepay by speaking out for him when he was arrested
(rightly in my view) as the war criminal he is in 98. However, I don't think
that is the reason Tony B'Liar helped let him off scot-free. Nor do I think
it's because she is probably his major role-model in politics.

On-topic; anybody have any good refs for the Chilean forces involved in the
coup; I know the AF went with the army against the Govt and imagine the Navy
would have as well. Anybody got better info? I have various books that refer
to it in passing but no detailed info.

John