A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

*********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 9th 09, 03:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ibby
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default *********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********


If you think a computer literate group of pilots needs you take on the value
of MSFS, then you are as full of yourself (and ****) as Mx.


So are you saying this
http://www.carenado.com/pages/C172FSX/1024X768/3.jpg
DOES NOT LOOK LIKE THIS
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...o, _2006).jpg

or
http://www.precisionmanuals.com/priv.../744_5_jpg.htm
looks like this
http://www.hoppie.nl/pic/747jh008.jpg

or

http://www.precisionmanuals.com/priv.../744_3_jpg.htm
look like this
http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices.../747400-04.jpg
or
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...light_deck.jpg

My 'contribution' to this group was in defense to how well some
software vendors affiliated with MSFS can model both the
photorealistic look and systems available on flightdecks. But NONE of
that matters on here. I'm not full of ****, I KNOW it takes skill to
pilot an aircraft especially if flown by HAND but I also do know that
coupled with an autopilot certain portions of flying have been made
easier via the advancement of technology on most aircraft and
commercial airlines make full use of this technology, otherwise what
is the point of automation?

Ibby
  #2  
Old March 9th 09, 01:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Maxwell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,043
Default *********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********


"Ibby" wrote in message
...

If you think a computer literate group of pilots needs you take on the
value
of MSFS, then you are as full of yourself (and ****) as Mx.


So are you saying this
http://www.carenado.com/pages/C172FSX/1024X768/3.jpg
DOES NOT LOOK LIKE THIS
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...o, _2006).jpg

or
http://www.precisionmanuals.com/priv.../744_5_jpg.htm
looks like this
http://www.hoppie.nl/pic/747jh008.jpg

or

http://www.precisionmanuals.com/priv.../744_3_jpg.htm
look like this
http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices.../747400-04.jpg
or
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...light_deck.jpg

My 'contribution' to this group was in defense to how well some
software vendors affiliated with MSFS can model both the
photorealistic look and systems available on flightdecks. But NONE of
that matters on here. I'm not full of ****, I KNOW it takes skill to
pilot an aircraft especially if flown by HAND but I also do know that
coupled with an autopilot certain portions of flying have been made
easier via the advancement of technology on most aircraft and
commercial airlines make full use of this technology, otherwise what
is the point of automation?

Ibby




No dumb ass, I'm saying:
If you think a computer literate group of pilots needs you take on the
value
of MSFS, then you are as full of yourself (and ****) as Mx.

Can you not read.


  #3  
Old March 3rd 09, 11:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
ManhattanMan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default *********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********

Morgans wrote:

Perhaps a sock,,,,, for ??????????? you-know-who????????



Negative. I've known Ibby for years in another group, as well as dipstick m
x...

I even agreed with dipstick once. Hey, one out of a thousand ain't bad!!


  #4  
Old March 3rd 09, 11:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
ManhattanMan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default *********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********

Morgans wrote:

Perhaps a sock,,,,, for ??????????? you-know-who????????



Negative. I've known Ibby for years in another group, as well as dipstick m
x...

I even agreed with dipstick once. Hey, one out of a thousand ain't bad!!


  #5  
Old March 8th 09, 11:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Morgans[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,924
Default *********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********


"ManhattanMan" wrote

Negative. I've known Ibby for years in another group, as well as dipstick
m x...

I even agreed with dipstick once. Hey, one out of a thousand ain't bad!!


Have you ever met him, face to face?

If not, I'm not totally convinced.
--
Jim in NC


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
*********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN*********** BeechSundowner Piloting 106 March 13th 09 03:13 AM
*********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN*********** BeechSundowner Piloting 0 March 3rd 09 10:18 PM
[email protected] Glenn Alderton[_2_] Aviation Photos 14 January 5th 07 03:35 AM
UK Defence Shakeup Ian MacLure Military Aviation 0 July 22nd 04 04:40 AM
U.S. pilot has new defence Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 June 30th 04 11:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.