![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Happy Dog" wrote in message ... "cjcampbell" Too many people try to fight the culture of dependency with a culture of self-reliance. Although it may be somewhat of an improvement, the culture of self-reliance says "I am responsible for myself. I have no obligation to anyone else, nor does anyone have any obligation towards me." Really? I doubt you'll find many self-reliant people who would agree. That's a strawman central to the rest of your argument. Neither would psychologists or other "self-help" types. He's engaging in a logical fallacy of "false-alternative". Tom S. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Doof" wrote in message
... "Happy Dog" wrote in message ... "cjcampbell" Too many people try to fight the culture of dependency with a culture of self-reliance. Although it may be somewhat of an improvement, the culture of self-reliance says "I am responsible for myself. I have no obligation to anyone else, nor does anyone have any obligation towards me." Really? I doubt you'll find many self-reliant people who would agree. That's a strawman central to the rest of your argument. Neither would psychologists or other "self-help" types. He's engaging in a logical fallacy of "false-alternative". Strawman, actually. His statement is a caricature of self-reliance advocates. Did you mean "false dilemma", BTW? moo |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Doof wrote: "Happy Dog" wrote in message ... "cjcampbell" Too many people try to fight the culture of dependency with a culture of self-reliance. Although it may be somewhat of an improvement, the culture of self-reliance says "I am responsible for myself. I have no obligation to anyone else, nor does anyone have any obligation towards me." Really? I doubt you'll find many self-reliant people who would agree. That's a strawman central to the rest of your argument. Neither would psychologists or other "self-help" types. He's engaging in a logical fallacy of "false-alternative". Tom S. If I have mistated my case, show me the rugged individualists posting here who have suggested lifting even one finger to help out the hurricane victims. To the contrary, they began by complaining the misuse of "their" money and resources for this task, and have suggested it would just be better to let them die. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"cjcampbell" wrote in message
oups.com... One of the big problems that we are dealing with is a culture of dependency. It is too easy to extend our perceptions of that problem to a point where people don't realize how inter-dependent they are. A culture of dependency is classless. I see it in rich and poor alike, among all races and people. It basically says, "I cannot do anything for myself. It is up to the government, or the rich, or somebody else, to provide for all my wants and needs." It is basically a refusal to grow up, to remain forever a child who is taken care of by its parents. It's possible, of course, to be excessively dependent. But in general, being able to create institutions that we can depend on for protection (from violence, from the aftermath of disasters, from unbreathable air...) is one of the great blessings of civilization. And as the example of pilots relying in part on SAR illustrates, such dependency is hardly tantamount to an attitude that "I cannot do anything for myself". --Gary |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gary Drescher wrote: "cjcampbell" wrote in message oups.com... One of the big problems that we are dealing with is a culture of dependency. It is too easy to extend our perceptions of that problem to a point where people don't realize how inter-dependent they are. A culture of dependency is classless. I see it in rich and poor alike, among all races and people. It basically says, "I cannot do anything for myself. It is up to the government, or the rich, or somebody else, to provide for all my wants and needs." It is basically a refusal to grow up, to remain forever a child who is taken care of by its parents. It's possible, of course, to be excessively dependent. But in general, being able to create institutions that we can depend on for protection (from violence, from the aftermath of disasters, from unbreathable air...) is one of the great blessings of civilization. And as the example of pilots relying in part on SAR illustrates, such dependency is hardly tantamount to an attitude that "I cannot do anything for myself". Yes, but there are way too many people in New Orleans (and everywhere else, for that matter) who are excessively dependent by any reasonable standard. Besides, haven't you heard? I am too tough on people who are independent. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Dan Luke" wrote: I'm going nuts. My airplane's at BFM, fueled up and ready to go, with a fresh annual. I'm on crutches, grounded by a ruptured tendon and scheduled for surgery that will keep me grounded for at least eight weeks. ouch. I hope it goes well for you. Maybe other pilots in the area would be willing to fly it for ya. :-) (.golf group trimmed - hope no one minds). -- Bob Noel no one likes an educated mule |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob Noel" wrote: ouch. I hope it goes well for you. Thanks. Maybe other pilots in the area would be willing to fly it for ya. :-) Ha! I'm sure. Not only can I not fly my airplane, I'm missing the chance to fly my buddy Lamar's Mooney while he's gone. This really sucks. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"cjcampbell" writes:
[snip] Speaking of which, Seattle once was below sea level like New Orleans. Instead of levees to keep water out, though, early Seattlites just used boats to navigate streets when the tide was in. After the great Seattle Fire, though, the rubble and material from some neighboring hills was used to raise the level of the whole city. I wonder how much of the rubble from Katrina could be used for that in New Orleans, assuming it is not all too contaminated to be useful? Biloxi, Slidell, and several smaller towns have an awful lot of garbage they are going to have to find a home for. I was thinking about the recovery/restoration effort for New Orleans and realized that using NO as a landfill site would solve several problems at once. Trying to restore NO to the way it was before Katrina makes no sense and expending copious resources to try to "improve" things will only move the same basic problems to the next time. If you build a city in a hole in the ocean, you have to expect major problems from time to time. Building bans are in place in other parts of the Mississippi River floodplain... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hurricane relief | Dave Stadt | Piloting | 94 | September 8th 05 08:02 PM |
| Hurricane relief | Gary Drescher | Instrument Flight Rules | 51 | September 8th 05 04:33 AM |
| Hurricane relief | [email protected] | Owning | 2 | September 5th 05 10:14 AM |
| Hurricane relief | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | September 5th 05 02:02 AM |
| Hurricane relief | Gary Drescher | Piloting | 0 | September 4th 05 03:27 AM |