Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service

Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.



Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Jerry


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)

All those moving parts...

Rich Ahrens wrote:

Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.



Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Jerry


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)

All those moving parts...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...
--

-Gord.

JL Grasso wrote:

"Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
JL Grasso wrote:
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.

Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Keyboard!

Thank tarver!

I've spewed soda on at least a dozen keyboards, from reading Splappy's posts.

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...
JL Grasso wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.

Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)

Pitot tubes are unreliable in comparason to a static port/pitot port
combination.

Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"



wrote:



The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts

out of

a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.


Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)


Pitot tubes are unreliable in comparason to a static port/pitot port
combination.

Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?



No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?


Matt

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...

A pitot tube is a fairly delicate instrument. There were artilce 15s for
those attepting to clean a pitot tube on our F-106 flightline. The pilots
did not apreciate having their displayed airspeed wrong.

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?

I have no interest in educating you, Whiting.

Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?



No, you have trouble writing things that make sense.

You're being charitable.

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...


No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?


I have no interest in educating you, Whiting.



I suspect my education is already well beyond yours, Tarver.

wrote:


Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?



No, you have trouble writing things that make sense.


You're being charitable.



Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)

Matt