A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 8th 06, 05:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Grumman-581[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 262
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

"Grumman-581" wrote in message
...
I've gone into 2X53 with my Grumman and
the 1900 ft of paved runway was just barely
enough for that attempt...


Correction -- 2XS3, not 2X53... Hmmm... I think they changed the identifier
on the airport to T51 these days... The most recent sectional that I had
here at the house was from 1998...


  #2  
Old November 6th 06, 01:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:40:06 -0500, Andrew Gideon
wrote in :

(why don't we call it a "nose wind" instead of a "headwind"?)


If the obverse of a coin is dubbed 'Tails,' why isn't he face called
'noses?' :-)
  #3  
Old November 6th 06, 03:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Doug[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 248
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

I wonder what the shortest, charted public airport runway is. It used
to be Bold in Alaska (at 1000'), but unless they've renamed it, its not
in airnav.com anymore.

  #4  
Old November 6th 06, 05:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Alan Gerber
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 104
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

Larry Dighera wrote:
If the obverse of a coin is dubbed 'Tails,' why isn't he face called
'noses?' :-)


Not to get pedantic or anything, but the *obverse* of a coin is "Heads".
The *reverse* is "Tails".

.... Alan
--
Alan Gerber
PP-ASEL
gerber AT panix DOT com
  #5  
Old November 6th 06, 05:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Don Tuite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 319
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 04:18:29 +0000 (UTC), Alan Gerber
wrote:

Larry Dighera wrote:
If the obverse of a coin is dubbed 'Tails,' why isn't he face called
'noses?' :-)


Not to get pedantic or anything, but the *obverse* of a coin is "Heads".
The *reverse* is "Tails".

And if it lands on the edge, that's perverse.

Don

  #6  
Old November 6th 06, 12:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 04:18:29 +0000 (UTC), Alan Gerber
wrote in :

Not to get pedantic or anything, but


You are correct. Thanks...
  #7  
Old November 6th 06, 03:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Judah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 936
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

Andrew Gideon wrote in
news
nose (why don't we call it a "nose wind" instead of a "headwind"?).


Sometimes your nose is pointed in a different direction, even though the wind
is still hitting you smack upside the head.


  #8  
Old November 6th 06, 04:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
M[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 207
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

Andrew Gideon wrote:


Someone on UNICOM described the problem with the runway: it's small, at
25' width and 1800' length.

That's a problem?


The reason is simple. There're plenty of pilots out there, for every
single year since they passed their checkride, they increase their
approach speed by about a knot, "just to be on the safe side". So 10
years later, short field approach speed in a 172 would be done at 70
KIAS.

  #9  
Old November 6th 06, 05:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Don Tuite
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 319
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

On 5 Nov 2006 19:26:57 -0800, "M" wrote:

Andrew Gideon wrote:


Someone on UNICOM described the problem with the runway: it's small, at
25' width and 1800' length.

That's a problem?


The reason is simple. There're plenty of pilots out there, for every
single year since they passed their checkride, they increase their
approach speed by about a knot, "just to be on the safe side". So 10
years later, short field approach speed in a 172 would be done at 70
KIAS.


One of the cues you use for flying a pattern is the aspect ratio of
the runway. At 500 feet, 25 x 1800' runway looks the same as a 50
by 3600' runway at 1000'. (Or something like that; my trig is rusty.)

So, while you're concentrating on the spot on the ground that doesn't
move, your brain is processing other data that says "weird." It can
be distracting.

Don
  #10  
Old November 6th 06, 09:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default Warning: 25' wide, 1800' long

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:30:14 GMT, Don Tuite
wrote:

On 5 Nov 2006 19:26:57 -0800, "M" wrote:

Andrew Gideon wrote:


Someone on UNICOM described the problem with the runway: it's small, at
25' width and 1800' length.

That's a problem?


The reason is simple. There're plenty of pilots out there, for every
single year since they passed their checkride, they increase their
approach speed by about a knot, "just to be on the safe side". So 10
years later, short field approach speed in a 172 would be done at 70
KIAS.


One of the cues you use for flying a pattern is the aspect ratio of
the runway. At 500 feet, 25 x 1800' runway looks the same as a 50
by 3600' runway at 1000'. (Or something like that; my trig is rusty.)


I normally use the altimeter so I don't even notice the aspect ratio
although I hear many talk about it.


So, while you're concentrating on the spot on the ground that doesn't
move, your brain is processing other data that says "weird." It can
be distracting.


Again whether it's a long skinny runway or short fat one, if the spot
doesn't move my brain seems to be happy. OTOH I've been acused of
being simple before.


Don

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flying our Cardinal south for its new plumage - Long report Longworth Owning 19 October 20th 05 01:23 AM
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post MrHabilis Home Built 0 June 11th 04 06:07 PM
Flight test update - long nauga Home Built 1 June 5th 04 04:09 AM
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) Dave S Home Built 20 May 21st 04 04:02 PM
IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations David B. Cole Instrument Flight Rules 0 February 24th 04 08:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.