![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Grumman-581" wrote in message
... I've gone into 2X53 with my Grumman and the 1900 ft of paved runway was just barely enough for that attempt... Correction -- 2XS3, not 2X53... Hmmm... I think they changed the identifier on the airport to T51 these days... The most recent sectional that I had here at the house was from 1998... |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 11:40:06 -0500, Andrew Gideon
wrote in : (why don't we call it a "nose wind" instead of a "headwind"?) If the obverse of a coin is dubbed 'Tails,' why isn't he face called 'noses?' :-) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wonder what the shortest, charted public airport runway is. It used
to be Bold in Alaska (at 1000'), but unless they've renamed it, its not in airnav.com anymore. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Larry Dighera wrote:
If the obverse of a coin is dubbed 'Tails,' why isn't he face called 'noses?' :-) Not to get pedantic or anything, but the *obverse* of a coin is "Heads". The *reverse* is "Tails". .... Alan -- Alan Gerber PP-ASEL gerber AT panix DOT com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 04:18:29 +0000 (UTC), Alan Gerber
wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: If the obverse of a coin is dubbed 'Tails,' why isn't he face called 'noses?' :-) Not to get pedantic or anything, but the *obverse* of a coin is "Heads". The *reverse* is "Tails". And if it lands on the edge, that's perverse. Don |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 04:18:29 +0000 (UTC), Alan Gerber
wrote in : Not to get pedantic or anything, but You are correct. Thanks... |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andrew Gideon wrote in
news
nose (why don't we call it a "nose wind" instead of a "headwind"?). Sometimes your nose is pointed in a different direction, even though the wind is still hitting you smack upside the head. ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andrew Gideon wrote:
Someone on UNICOM described the problem with the runway: it's small, at 25' width and 1800' length. That's a problem? The reason is simple. There're plenty of pilots out there, for every single year since they passed their checkride, they increase their approach speed by about a knot, "just to be on the safe side". So 10 years later, short field approach speed in a 172 would be done at 70 KIAS. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 5 Nov 2006 19:26:57 -0800, "M" wrote:
Andrew Gideon wrote: Someone on UNICOM described the problem with the runway: it's small, at 25' width and 1800' length. That's a problem? The reason is simple. There're plenty of pilots out there, for every single year since they passed their checkride, they increase their approach speed by about a knot, "just to be on the safe side". So 10 years later, short field approach speed in a 172 would be done at 70 KIAS. One of the cues you use for flying a pattern is the aspect ratio of the runway. At 500 feet, 25 x 1800' runway looks the same as a 50 by 3600' runway at 1000'. (Or something like that; my trig is rusty.) So, while you're concentrating on the spot on the ground that doesn't move, your brain is processing other data that says "weird." It can be distracting. Don |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:30:14 GMT, Don Tuite
wrote: On 5 Nov 2006 19:26:57 -0800, "M" wrote: Andrew Gideon wrote: Someone on UNICOM described the problem with the runway: it's small, at 25' width and 1800' length. That's a problem? The reason is simple. There're plenty of pilots out there, for every single year since they passed their checkride, they increase their approach speed by about a knot, "just to be on the safe side". So 10 years later, short field approach speed in a 172 would be done at 70 KIAS. One of the cues you use for flying a pattern is the aspect ratio of the runway. At 500 feet, 25 x 1800' runway looks the same as a 50 by 3600' runway at 1000'. (Or something like that; my trig is rusty.) I normally use the altimeter so I don't even notice the aspect ratio although I hear many talk about it. So, while you're concentrating on the spot on the ground that doesn't move, your brain is processing other data that says "weird." It can be distracting. Again whether it's a long skinny runway or short fat one, if the spot doesn't move my brain seems to be happy. OTOH I've been acused of being simple before. Don Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flying our Cardinal south for its new plumage - Long report | Longworth | Owning | 19 | October 20th 05 01:23 AM |
| Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 06:07 PM |
| Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 04:09 AM |
| SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 04:02 PM |
| IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations | David B. Cole | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | February 24th 04 08:51 PM |