A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How wide is an NDB approach course?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 19th 07, 11:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jim Carter[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 403
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?



-----Original Message-----
From: Robert M. Gary ]
Posted At: Friday, January 19, 2007 12:20 PM
Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr
Conversation: How wide is an NDB approach course?
Subject: How wide is an NDB approach course?


....
If, when reaching the MAP, you are in the same city as the airport you
count yourself luck.

-Robert


I realize a lot of the responses are written in humor, but lest some of
the younger readers get the wrong impression - it is still possible to
properly execute an NDB approach and safely arrive if the weather is
above published minimums. Hundreds of pilots flew LF range and NDB
approaches for many years without killing themselves or their
passengers.

Just because the technology has advanced to what we have today with WAAS
GPSs and XM weather and roll-steering autopilots doesn't mean that the
old NDB approach is inherently unsafe.

I believe the unsafe aspect of the system is the lack of training in
modern curriculums and our lack of practice with the equipment.


  #2  
Old January 20th 07, 07:03 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Andrey Serbinenko
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 68
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?

I believe the unsafe aspect of the system is the lack of training in
modern curriculums and our lack of practice with the equipment.


This reminded me of a useful training aid that I've put together
some time ago. It is a known fact that any AM radio station can
serve as a radio beacon that an ADF can be tuned to. AM radio
stations are everywhere, unlike real NDB transmitters, and they are
just as good for practicing NDB work as any NDB. So, I have
downloaded a list of AM-transmitting antenna from FCC, along with
their lat/lon, callsign, and output power, and transformed it into
a google-earth file. Then I zoomed-in on the area of my interest
in google-earth, and printed the map with the stations. Very handy
for NDB practice. Here's a link to the google-earth file containing
all AM-transmitting antenna within 1000km radius of NYC:
http://tinyurl.com/35rdez
If anyone wants such a file for some other part of the US, just let
me know, and I'll generate it and put it online.



Andrey


  #3  
Old January 20th 07, 02:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?

Andrey Serbinenko wrote:

I believe the unsafe aspect of the system is the lack of training in
modern curriculums and our lack of practice with the equipment.



This reminded me of a useful training aid that I've put together
some time ago. It is a known fact that any AM radio station can
serve as a radio beacon that an ADF can be tuned to. AM radio
stations are everywhere, unlike real NDB transmitters, and they are
just as good for practicing NDB work as any NDB. So, I have
downloaded a list of AM-transmitting antenna from FCC, along with
their lat/lon, callsign, and output power, and transformed it into
a google-earth file. Then I zoomed-in on the area of my interest
in google-earth, and printed the map with the stations. Very handy
for NDB practice. Here's a link to the google-earth file containing
all AM-transmitting antenna within 1000km radius of NYC:
http://tinyurl.com/35rdez
If anyone wants such a file for some other part of the US, just let
me know, and I'll generate it and put it online.


That is pretty neat. Yes, I used 1490 in Wellsboro for practice at N38.
It isn't exctly aligned with the runway, but is close and we made up a
little home-made approach for practice. It worked well.

Matt
  #4  
Old January 20th 07, 03:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?

Matt Whiting writes:

That is pretty neat. Yes, I used 1490 in Wellsboro for practice at N38.
It isn't exctly aligned with the runway, but is close and we made up a
little home-made approach for practice. It worked well.


I think the NDB concept was deliberately designed with this in mind,
so that ordinary radio stations could be used for emergency navigation
in a pinch. The frequency range is the same as AM radio, and I hardly
think that a coincidence.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #5  
Old January 20th 07, 03:19 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jake Brodsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?

Andrey Serbinenko wrote:
I believe the unsafe aspect of the system is the lack of training in
modern curriculums and our lack of practice with the equipment.


This reminded me of a useful training aid that I've put together
some time ago. It is a known fact that any AM radio station can
serve as a radio beacon that an ADF can be tuned to. AM radio
stations are everywhere, unlike real NDB transmitters, and they are
just as good for practicing NDB work as any NDB. So, I have
downloaded a list of AM-transmitting antenna from FCC, along with
their lat/lon, callsign, and output power, and transformed it into
a google-earth file. Then I zoomed-in on the area of my interest
in google-earth, and printed the map with the stations. Very handy
for NDB practice. Here's a link to the google-earth file containing
all AM-transmitting antenna within 1000km radius of NYC:
http://tinyurl.com/35rdez
If anyone wants such a file for some other part of the US, just let
me know, and I'll generate it and put it online.


The only problem I have with trying to use a MW AM radio station for
navigation is that they don't have consistent power and radiation
patterns. Typically they'll broadcast a reasonably strong signal during
the day. However at night, because the ionospheric absorption goes down
and because the signal can skip, the FCC requires most stations to dial
their power back and change antenna patterns.

This can result in a sudden loss of signal when the sun sets. I would
advise anyone looking for NDB practice to avoid the evening hours, and
not to navigate with AM stations in actual IMC conditions unless you're
very familiar with the radiation pattern and power output of the station
you're using. Remember, AM radio stations no longer report service
outages via NOTAM, so you're pretty much on your own here.

Jake Brodsky
  #6  
Old January 20th 07, 03:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,232
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?

Jake Brodsky wrote:
Andrey Serbinenko wrote:

I believe the unsafe aspect of the system is the lack of training in
modern curriculums and our lack of practice with the equipment.



This reminded me of a useful training aid that I've put together
some time ago. It is a known fact that any AM radio station can
serve as a radio beacon that an ADF can be tuned to. AM radio
stations are everywhere, unlike real NDB transmitters, and they are
just as good for practicing NDB work as any NDB. So, I have
downloaded a list of AM-transmitting antenna from FCC, along with
their lat/lon, callsign, and output power, and transformed it into
a google-earth file. Then I zoomed-in on the area of my interest
in google-earth, and printed the map with the stations. Very handy
for NDB practice. Here's a link to the google-earth file containing
all AM-transmitting antenna within 1000km radius of NYC:
http://tinyurl.com/35rdez
If anyone wants such a file for some other part of the US, just let
me know, and I'll generate it and put it online.



The only problem I have with trying to use a MW AM radio station for
navigation is that they don't have consistent power and radiation
patterns. Typically they'll broadcast a reasonably strong signal during
the day. However at night, because the ionospheric absorption goes down
and because the signal can skip, the FCC requires most stations to dial
their power back and change antenna patterns.


He clearly said for practice use, not for actual navigation. I actually
found the signal better from the radio station than from most NDBs,
but I definitely wouldn't depend on one for anything other than practice
with a safety pilot or instructor in VFR conditions.


Matt
  #7  
Old January 20th 07, 04:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?

Jake Brodsky writes:

Remember, AM radio stations no longer report service
outages via NOTAM, so you're pretty much on your own here.


Are you saying that they did this at one time in the past?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #8  
Old January 22nd 07, 04:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Andrey Serbinenko
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 68
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?

I didn't know that. Thanks for the info!

Andrey


Jake Brodsky wrote:

the day. However at night, because the ionospheric absorption goes down
and because the signal can skip, the FCC requires most stations to dial
their power back and change antenna patterns.

  #9  
Old January 21st 07, 02:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Sam Spade
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,326
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?

Jim Carter wrote:



I realize a lot of the responses are written in humor, but lest some of
the younger readers get the wrong impression - it is still possible to
properly execute an NDB approach and safely arrive if the weather is
above published minimums. Hundreds of pilots flew LF range and NDB
approaches for many years without killing themselves or their
passengers.


Most of the NDB IAPs flown by airlines was with slaved RMI/ADF
indicators. Those approaches became seldom used by the major carriers
by the early 1960s.
  #10  
Old January 21st 07, 05:56 PM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Jim Carter[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 403
Default How wide is an NDB approach course?



-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Spade ]
Posted At: Sunday, January 21, 2007 7:32 AM
Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr
Conversation: How wide is an NDB approach course?
Subject: How wide is an NDB approach course?

....
Most of the NDB IAPs flown by airlines was with slaved RMI/ADF
indicators. Those approaches became seldom used by the major carriers
by the early 1960s.


All of my experience has been 91, 135, and 141 so I defer to those with
121 experience for that topic.

NDBs (we still called them ADFs) were still in wide use for Wichita iron
back in the early '70s and that is where my exposure started. We flew
NDB approaches quite frequently in the mid-west and plain states because
ILS was only available at major metropolitan centers and VOR was only
available at a few remote airports (like Gage, Oklahoma). There were
frequently other fields around, but there were no pub'd VOR approaches
for a lot of them so we had to use NDB.

Those approaches work just as well today as they did 35 years ago, but I
will grant you that they take more work and more diligence to execute
properly. NDB approaches are definitely not my first choice unless there
is some young pup in the right seat who's been bustin' my balls about
being an ancient aviator. Then an NDB approach can be a real humbling
experience with a good wind and maybe a few static discharges off in the
distance.

BTW, old Frontier pilots probably still have nightmares about all the
NDBs they had to fly because of all the little farm towns they serviced.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VFR position reporting Mxsmanic Piloting 154 November 26th 06 05:45 PM
Trust those intruments Trust those instruments A Lieberman Instrument Flight Rules 5 May 3rd 06 02:26 AM
Where is approach good about multiple approaches and clearances in the air? Andrew Gideon Instrument Flight Rules 29 February 14th 04 03:51 AM
Study pilot workload during approach and landing Freshfighter Piloting 5 December 7th 03 05:06 PM
IR checkride story! Guy Elden Jr. Instrument Flight Rules 16 August 1st 03 10:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.