![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... My friendly-neighborhood AIRPORT manager tried to mandate no self-fueling of aircraft shortly after we shelled out just shy of $2000 for an autogas STC for our PA-28-180. I pointed him in the direction of the regulations regarding restrictions on public airports that accept federal funding. Included in those (can't find the link at the moment) is a requirement that pilots can fuel their own aircraft for non-commercial use. Non-issue after that. -Cory The FAA doc is AC 150/5190-6 http://tinyurl.com/yo2ezv John Severyn KLVK Livermore, Ca. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"pgbnh" wrote:
"Al G" wrote... "B A R R Y" wrote... 2.) I want to calibrate a fuel dipstick, so I remove a gallon at a time while taking readings. After I read the tank, I return the fuel to the tank. I've been told this is a violation. The person who tells me this can't cite a FAR, and I can't find one in my own search. I hope it is not a violation, I've had to do this at remote mountain airstrips for years. I have seen tanks calibrated(Sticks & Gauges) in an approved shop. Greater likelihood is that you may be violating an AIRPORT rule. If your field does not permit self-fueling, then the activity you note would probably be considered a violation. But FAR's???? Naahh ! Fly it to a remote strip and do as you wish, but follow the antistatic procedures others have mentioned... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:55:49 GMT, Darrel Toepfer
wrote: "pgbnh" wrote: "Al G" wrote... "B A R R Y" wrote... 2.) I want to calibrate a fuel dipstick, so I remove a gallon at a time while taking readings. After I read the tank, I return the fuel to the tank. I've been told this is a violation. The person who tells me this can't cite a FAR, and I can't find one in my own search. I hope it is not a violation, I've had to do this at remote mountain airstrips for years. I have seen tanks calibrated(Sticks & Gauges) in an approved shop. Greater likelihood is that you may be violating an AIRPORT rule. If your field does not permit self-fueling, then the activity you note would probably be considered a violation. But FAR's???? Naahh ! Check those airport rules, but when I had the Deb weighed for a new W&B (old airplanes like old pilots tend to gain weight) they drained the tanks. (it was down to about 60 gallons) and then put it back along with enough to top off *all* tanks. If it's a violation that was a mighty big company doing the violating. Fly it to a remote strip and do as you wish, but follow the antistatic procedures others have mentioned... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
An FAA ops inspector at HQ once gave me a list of all of the regulatory
agencies pilots have to answer to. One of them was the EPA. If there is any prohibition against doing what you suggest you will find it in EPA regs, not FARs. The FARs are only the tip of the iceberg. Bob Gardner "B A R R Y" wrote in message . net... Does anyone know of a FAR that prohibits removing fuel, avgas in this case, and then putting it back into the same plane? The plane is flown for part 91 service only. Examples: 1.) The plane is 50 pounds overweight for conditions. 10 gallons is siphoned out into a clean, single-purpose, approved for gasoline container. The sealed container is stored in a safe place. 2-3 hours later, upon completing the trip and returning to the field, I pour it back into the tank. 2.) I want to calibrate a fuel dipstick, so I remove a gallon at a time while taking readings. After I read the tank, I return the fuel to the tank. I've been told this is a violation. The person who tells me this can't cite a FAR, and I can't find one in my own search. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry about the double post...senior moment.
Bob "Bob Gardner" wrote in message . .. An FAA ops inspector at HQ once gave me a list of all of the regulatory agencies pilots have to answer to. One of them was the EPA. If there is any prohibition against doing what you suggest you will find it in EPA regs, not FARs. The FARs are only the tip of the iceberg. Bob Gardner "B A R R Y" wrote in message . net... Does anyone know of a FAR that prohibits removing fuel, avgas in this case, and then putting it back into the same plane? The plane is flown for part 91 service only. Examples: 1.) The plane is 50 pounds overweight for conditions. 10 gallons is siphoned out into a clean, single-purpose, approved for gasoline container. The sealed container is stored in a safe place. 2-3 hours later, upon completing the trip and returning to the field, I pour it back into the tank. 2.) I want to calibrate a fuel dipstick, so I remove a gallon at a time while taking readings. After I read the tank, I return the fuel to the tank. I've been told this is a violation. The person who tells me this can't cite a FAR, and I can't find one in my own search. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pilots frequently say "I can't find it in the regulations" after limiting
their search to Parts 1, 61, 67, 91, and (occasionally) 119/135. An FAA ops inspector at HQ once gave me a list of all of the agencies whose regulations impact pilots. I no longer have the list, but as I recall there were about 20. We know about the NTSB Part 830 accident/incident regs because they are on the knowledge exams, and we know that there are National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Interior Department regs affecting both airspace and landing areas because they show up on sectionals and things like the Grand Canyon SFAR. What I am leading up to is a guess that the Environmental Protection Agency may very well have a reg that speaks to the operation you propose. The airport management and/or the governmental entity operating the airport might have local regulations on the subject. Bottom line is that you can't just look to the FARs when contemplating an action. Bob Gardner "B A R R Y" wrote in message . net... Does anyone know of a FAR that prohibits removing fuel, avgas in this case, and then putting it back into the same plane? The plane is flown for part 91 service only. Examples: 1.) The plane is 50 pounds overweight for conditions. 10 gallons is siphoned out into a clean, single-purpose, approved for gasoline container. The sealed container is stored in a safe place. 2-3 hours later, upon completing the trip and returning to the field, I pour it back into the tank. 2.) I want to calibrate a fuel dipstick, so I remove a gallon at a time while taking readings. After I read the tank, I return the fuel to the tank. I've been told this is a violation. The person who tells me this can't cite a FAR, and I can't find one in my own search. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:33:28 -0400, B A R R Y
wrote: Does anyone know of a FAR that prohibits removing fuel, avgas in this case, and then putting it back into the same plane? The plane is flown for part 91 service only. Examples: 1.) The plane is 50 pounds overweight for conditions. 10 gallons is siphoned out into a clean, single-purpose, approved for gasoline container. The sealed container is stored in a safe place. 2-3 hours later, upon completing the trip and returning to the field, I pour it back into the tank. 2.) I want to calibrate a fuel dipstick, so I remove a gallon at a time while taking readings. After I read the tank, I return the fuel to the tank. I've been told this is a violation. The person who tells me this can't cite a FAR, and I can't find one in my own search. barry you cant do it with people in the aircraft. that is in the regs. when you do it make sure you have an earth connection between the aircraft and the container. this can be as simple as a piece of fence wire in the container touching the aircraft so as to bleed static differences between the two. more elaborate would be a piece of automotive wire with a crocodile clip on each end clipped between the aircraft and the container. with static taken care of you worst problem is spillage. when you have the time go and get a copy of the regs and read them yourself. it isnt difficult to understand them and you will have in your memory an authoritative picture of them. the world gets easier after that. when you put the fuel back into the aircraft just pour it through a funnel with a micromesh filter in it, they are as cheap as chips in discount automotive shops and they exclude crud and water. Stealth Pilot |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for all the GREAT info! |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
FWIW, I found the best way to de-fuel my plane is through the carb.
Unfortunately, it renders the fuel unusable, but it's alot of fun. "B A R R Y" wrote in message news ![]() Thanks for all the GREAT info! |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
El Maximo wrote:
FWIW, I found the best way to de-fuel my plane is through the carb. Unfortunately, it renders the fuel unusable, but it's alot of fun. Me too, but when you're 50 pounds over, and don't have the extra hour... |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Replacing innertubes without replacing tires? | Ben Jackson | Owning | 28 | November 6th 06 05:54 PM |
| Removing 100LL Fuel Stain | Jeff | Home Built | 7 | September 20th 05 09:45 PM |
| FOLO: Replacing fuel cut-off valve with non-a/c part??? | Michael Horowitz | Owning | 10 | February 23rd 05 05:35 AM |
| Fuel quality control standards for aircraft rental/fuel sales... | [email protected] | Owning | 19 | January 19th 05 05:12 AM |
| Replacing fuel cut-off valve with non-a/c part??? | Michael Horowitz | Owning | 46 | January 15th 05 11:20 PM |