Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 2/27/2004 5:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...

Or "The Tarver autoland functioned as well as the designer."

Watch the slander Dan, I am a real company.


So sue me.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 2/27/2004 5:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...

Or "The Tarver autoland functioned as well as the designer."

Watch the slander Dan, I am a real company.

So sue me.

UPS delivers.

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 2/27/2004 7:11 PM Central

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Tarver Engineering"
Date: 2/27/2004 5:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...

Or "The Tarver autoland functioned as well as the designer."

Watch the slander Dan, I am a real company.

So sue me.

UPS delivers.

Now THAT makes sense.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

JL Grasso wrote:

"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.

Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Keyboard!

JL Grasso wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.


Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Jerry


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)


Matt

Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.



Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Jerry


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)

All those moving parts...

Rich Ahrens wrote:

Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.



Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Jerry


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)

All those moving parts...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...
--

-Gord.

JL Grasso wrote:

"Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
JL Grasso wrote:
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.

Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Keyboard!

Thank tarver!

I've spewed soda on at least a dozen keyboards, from reading Splappy's posts.

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...
JL Grasso wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.

Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)

Pitot tubes are unreliable in comparason to a static port/pitot port
combination.

Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"



wrote:



The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts

out of

a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.


Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)


Pitot tubes are unreliable in comparason to a static port/pitot port
combination.

Do you have trouble reading, Whiting?



No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?


Matt