A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

pilots refuse to fly with gun loons onboard



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 31st 03, 05:42 AM
Webzpider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mongo Jones" wrote in message
s.com...
In talk.politics.guns Chris Morton wrote:


In article , nick says...

"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."


Pizza loving anti-Semite points out that British pilots would rather fly into
buildings than have armed POLICE on board.

They're as big a bunch of netwits as Jew hater Nick.


We should put the British Airline Pilots' Association on notice that
any flight WITHOUT armed sky marshals on board will be shot down as a
precautionary measure.


What's the name of your terrorist group?


Webzpider

" I found alligator a bit chewy, but not bad."
-*MORT*-


  #2  
Old December 31st 03, 01:30 PM
Shaun
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:44:42 GMT, Mongo Jones
wrote:

In talk.politics.guns Chris Morton wrote:


In article , nick says...

"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."


Pizza loving anti-Semite points out that British pilots would rather fly into
buildings than have armed POLICE on board.

They're as big a bunch of netwits as Jew hater Nick.


We should put the British Airline Pilots' Association on notice that
any flight WITHOUT armed sky marshals on board will be shot down as a
precautionary measure.


That could only happen with the permision of the President.

Will he be too busy reading about the goat this time ?
  #3  
Old December 31st 03, 02:29 PM
Morton Davis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Shaun" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:44:42 GMT, Mongo Jones
wrote:

In talk.politics.guns Chris Morton wrote:


In article , nick

says...

"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots'

union
called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."

Pizza loving anti-Semite points out that British pilots would rather fly

into
buildings than have armed POLICE on board.

They're as big a bunch of netwits as Jew hater Nick.


We should put the British Airline Pilots' Association on notice that
any flight WITHOUT armed sky marshals on board will be shot down as a
precautionary measure.


That could only happen with the permision of the President.


The order has already been given.

Will he be too busy reading about the goat this time ?


Too busy obfuscating?

-*MORT*-


  #4  
Old December 31st 03, 04:44 PM
Bogart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 12:30:23 +0000, Shaun
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:44:42 GMT, Mongo Jones
wrote:


We should put the British Airline Pilots' Association on notice that
any flight WITHOUT armed sky marshals on board will be shot down as a
precautionary measure.


That could only happen with the permision of the President.


And?

Will he be too busy reading about the goat this time ?


You think _every time_ the military fires a missile they stop to ask
for the President's permission? Bwahaha...etc.
  #5  
Old December 31st 03, 10:38 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mongo Jones" wrote in message
s.com...
In talk.politics.guns Chris Morton wrote:


In article , nick

says...

"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots'

union
called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."


Pizza loving anti-Semite points out that British pilots would rather fly

into
buildings than have armed POLICE on board.

They're as big a bunch of netwits as Jew hater Nick.


We should put the British Airline Pilots' Association on notice that
any flight WITHOUT armed sky marshals on board will be shot down as a
precautionary measure.


So what new? In both Gulf wars the British lost more aircraft to so called
friendly fire than enemy action. So why change the habits of a life time. If
it moves shoot it.


  #6  
Old January 1st 04, 08:44 PM
Mongo Jones
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In talk.politics.guns "Dave" wrote:


"Mongo Jones" wrote in message
ws.com...
In talk.politics.guns Chris Morton wrote:


In article , nick

says...

"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots'

union
called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."

Pizza loving anti-Semite points out that British pilots would rather fly

into
buildings than have armed POLICE on board.

They're as big a bunch of netwits as Jew hater Nick.


We should put the British Airline Pilots' Association on notice that
any flight WITHOUT armed sky marshals on board will be shot down as a
precautionary measure.


So what new? In both Gulf wars the British lost more aircraft to so called
friendly fire than enemy action. So why change the habits of a life time. If
it moves shoot it.


Picard
Make it so.
/Picard

  #7  
Old December 30th 03, 08:52 PM
Little John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:50:49 -0000, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
"nick" two-fingered to all:

|"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
|called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
|
|"Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the British
|Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
|
|"Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our advice
|to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are received,
|flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are carried."
|
|http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3357309.stm

Bunch of pussies.


jammin1-at-jammin1-dot-com

jammin1's Resources
www.jammin1.com
  #8  
Old December 30th 03, 10:04 PM
Bill Funk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:52:27 -0700, Little John
wrote:

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:50:49 -0000, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
"nick" two-fingered to all:

|"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
|called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
|
|"Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the British
|Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
|
|"Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our advice
|to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are received,
|flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are carried."
|
|http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3357309.stm

Bunch of pussies.


Well, now, wait a sec...
Nick's complaining that the British pilots aren't sure abou the
efficacy of having BRITISH marshals on board.
I can see that. They have so little actual experience with guns, you
know. There's no telling whether they actually know what to do with
them.

"We want to hear that the captain will be the one in command of the
aircraft at all times, we seek reassurances about the weapons to be
used and the training given."

--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
  #9  
Old December 31st 03, 01:00 AM
Little John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:04:54 -0700, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
Bill Funk two-fingered to all:

|On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 12:52:27 -0700, Little John
wrote:
|
|On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:50:49 -0000, in a fit of unbridled digital verbosity,
|once again proving the problem is located between the seat and the keyboard,
|"nick" two-fingered to all:
|
||"Some flights to the US could be grounded after the airline pilots' union
||called on its members not to fly with armed sky marshals on board."
||
||"Airline pilots should not take off with marshals on board, the British
||Airline Pilots' Association (Balpa) has said."
||
||"Capt Granshaw defended pilots' right to take action and said: "Our advice
||to pilots is that until adequate written and agreed assurances are
received,
||flight crew should not operate flights where sky marshals are carried."
||
||http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3357309.stm
|
|Bunch of pussies.
|
|Well, now, wait a sec...
|Nick's complaining that the British pilots aren't sure abou the
|efficacy of having BRITISH marshals on board.
|I can see that. They have so little actual experience with guns, you
|know. There's no telling whether they actually know what to do with
|them.

Like I said... :-)


jammin1-at-jammin1-dot-com

jammin1's Resources
www.jammin1.com
  #10  
Old January 1st 04, 08:44 PM
pacplyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill Funk wrote

Well, now, wait a sec...
Nick's complaining that the British pilots aren't sure abou the
efficacy of having BRITISH marshals on board.
I can see that. They have so little actual experience with guns, you
know. There's no telling whether they actually know what to do with
them.

"We want to hear that the captain will be the one in command of the
aircraft at all times, we seek reassurances about the weapons to be
used and the training given."


Finally, someone understands what this is really about. You can only
have one Captain on the ship. Good post Bill. Appologies to my
friends across the Atlantic for the poor behavior of some of the
posters here. As you can see there are drawbacks to supplying cheap
computers and flight simulators to the common masses...

pacplyer
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
Dover short pilots since vaccine order Roman Bystrianyk Naval Aviation 0 December 29th 04 01:47 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! Military Aviation 120 January 27th 04 11:19 AM
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? No Spam! General Aviation 3 December 23rd 03 09:53 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 02:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.