![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Cub Driver wrote: For political reasons, it would have been appropriate for the RIGHT WINGman to be the one that departed. Isn't it always? I think of a finger-four as the fingers of my right hand, with the lead being the middle finger. The Missing Man is the leader of the second element, flying to the right and behind the leader of the flight--the ring finger of the right hand. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org It depends on whether the formation is "Hard Right" or "Hard Left". In the latter, #3 is on the left and pulls, as it is always #3 in a 4-ship that pulls and "flies West." |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Nathan Gilliatt" wrote in message ... In article , emoove (tony) wrote: For this man, this president, tradition should have been broken. The missing man was a Leader. The lead position should have been the vacant one. Symbolism aside, wouldn't the formation fall apart without a Lead? You'd end up with a two-ship formation and a single plane flying near each other, but not in a proper (practiced) formation, right? Kinda wondered about this myself, Nate. Marty |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
For this man, this president, tradition should have been broken. The missing man was a Leader. The lead position should have been the vacant one. If the leader were missing, would anyone know it was a Missing Man, as opposed to two planes flying alongside a third plane at some distance? all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
If the leader were missing, would anyone know it was a Missing Man, as opposed to two planes flying alongside a third plane at some distance? Symbols are like that. The two element formation approaches, all four aircraft in view, and one exits. If you know about "Missing Man Formations" you'd probably understand. If one doesn't, perhaps it would have to be explained. With respect to the questions about safety without the lead element leader, I suspect nearly any three of us could fly a the first element wingman slot safely keying on the leader of the second element. I can accept traditon as the reason to fly it as it had been flown, but in that it's symbolic I rather liked the idea of the lead aircraft going absent. Others didn't. It lead to an interesting thread, though, esp the poster who wrote of the Reagan's sense it was a requirement of the office that such a funeral be held. Back during his term, it had been written he always went to his office with coat and tie, as a mark of reverence for the place. Another thought -- even better. Didn't President Reagan fund the B1B? Now, that would be a fly-by! About my comment for the mid air refueling flyby for former President Clinton -- I'm thinking now three supersonic bombers, at perhaps mach 2, would also be fitting. Where are my flame proof pants? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"tony" wrote in message ... Another thought -- even better. Didn't President Reagan fund the B1B? Yes. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you know about "Missing Man Formations" you'd probably understand. If one doesn't, perhaps it would have to be explained. http://www.warbirdforum.com/missing.htm Enjoy! all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
If the leader were missing, would anyone know it was a Missing Man, as opposed to two planes flying alongside a third plane at some distance? all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) Perhaps the presentation is when the "missing" aircraft pulls up and out of the flight of four? Or perhaps you've never experienced the event in person. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
tony wrote:
Former President Reagan's sunset burial had a dissonant note for me. The Navy flew a missing man formation over the site, and as is traditional the second element lead position (the airplane that would have been represented by your ring finger tip as they flew in finger tip formation) left its position, representing the missing man. For this man, this president, tradition should have been broken. The missing man was a Leader. The lead position should have been the vacant one. Wasn't that how they did it over Washington (or maybe it was Pt. Mugu)? On TV I thought I saw *lead* break away during one of the missing man flyovers for Reagan. It was such an unusual sight I wondered if my eyes had fooled me. I'm still not sure. Did anyone else notice that? The only other time I can remember lead departing a missing man formation was a Memorial Day flyover at Edwards AFB with T-38s. A few minutes later a sonic boom rocked the base. It may have been lead flying solo, or perhaps the formation got back together. -- Paul Hirose To reply by email delete INVALID from address. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flight of two, IFR | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | January 13th 20 02:12 PM |
| Four Navy avaitors on San Diego-based carrier listed as missing | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 11th 04 06:03 AM |
| missing man formation for Reagan | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 1 | June 14th 04 01:50 AM |
| Search for missing plane | C J Campbell | Piloting | 2 | March 4th 04 02:42 AM |
| Ellery Queen and the Case of the Missing Magneto Gear Teeth | MikeremlaP | Owning | 3 | July 26th 03 04:01 AM |