![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Koopas Ly wrote: With regards to fuel tanks in a C172, why does the takeoff and landing checklists both call for the fuel selector handle to be in the "both tanks" position? It's basically to ensure that you will have fuel through the entire takeoff. The reason it's done for landing is in case you need to go around. The idea is that, even if one tank goes empty or has some other problem, you will have a steady supply of fuel. The only time that fuel is set to one particular tank is on the ground. Then you don't have to worry too much about it, do you? I've never used fuel from only one tank in flight. Why would someone do that? I do it in my Maule to equalize fuel burn. It will draw down the left tank more rapidly than the right if I don't. I believe most Cessnas are worse in this regard than my aircraft; my 150 certainly was. Also, why is the fuel selector set to one tank during refueling? Is it to minimize crossfeeding? Yep. In my Maule, the lower tank will overflow through the vents if this is not done. My 150 (which didn't have the option of selecting tanks) would do the same if the vented tank was the lower one. Note that my Maule will do this even if the selector is set to "off". Dunno if that's the case with a Cessna. George Patterson Some people think they hear a call to the priesthood when what they really hear is a tiny voice whispering "It's indoor work with no heavy lifting". |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Also, why is the fuel selector set to one tank during refueling? Is
it to minimize crossfeeding? Yep. In my Maule, the lower tank will overflow through the vents if this is not done. My 150 (which didn't have the option of selecting tanks) would do the same if the vented tank was the lower one. Note that my Maule will do this even if the selector is set to "off". Dunno if that's the case with a Cessna. Would you mind re-explaining the mechanics you just described? I don't get the "overflow through the vents" part". Thanks a bunch, Alex |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Koopas Ly wrote: Would you mind re-explaining the mechanics you just described? I don't get the "overflow through the vents" part". On the Maule, each tank has two 1/8" tubes which run up through the bottom of the tank and end just below the top, inside the tank. These are vents intended to allow air to enter the tank as fuel is burned. If the tank is overfilled, the excess will also run out the vents. My old 150 had only one of these vents, but it also had vented fuel tank caps. The vent of the 150 is larger than those on Maules. The Maule has a fuel system in which there is a fuel line coming out of one of the lowest spots in the tank. IIRC, the right tank line crosses the cabin just behind the top of the windshield, and both left and right fuel lines then run down inside the left front door post to a valve on the lower left side panel. A single fuel line then runs from here to the engine. In the 150, the valve is in the floor, and I'm not sure if the right line crosses above or below the cabin. The 150 also had a separate line between the two tanks which ran above the cabin to allow air flow between the tanks to try to equalize fuel burn, and fuel flows through this if either tank is more than about 3/8 full. In either case, if the valve is "on" in the 150 or on "both" in the Maule, and you park the plane sideways on an incline, fuel will run downhill to the lower tank through the valve. If both tanks are full, fuel will discharge through the vent tubes on that tank. In my 150, this was only a problem if the plane was parked so that the vent was on the downhill side. Some aircraft have anti-syphon devices on the vent tubes to prevent this sort of thing. Perhaps the 172 does. This problem also occurs in my Maule when the valve is "off", but not when it is set to "left" or "right". I do not understand why this happens, but apparently it is not unique to Maules. I got the suggestion of setting it to one tank from an article in either AOPA Pilot or Sport Aviation some time back. The author was advising someone else who had the same problem. George Patterson Some people think they hear a call to the priesthood when what they really hear is a tiny voice whispering "It's indoor work with no heavy lifting". |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't have a "both" on my Mooney and I DO NOT miss it. "Both" just
means that if you ever run out of gas, you're really out of gas. The Cessna 140 I used to fly would drain all the gas from the left before touching the gas in the right (its not the same as the C-150, there is no interconnecting hose in the 140). -Robert (Koopas Ly) wrote in message . com... Good day all, With regards to fuel tanks in a C172, why does the takeoff and landing checklists both call for the fuel selector handle to be in the "both tanks" position? The only time that fuel is set to one particular tank is on the ground. I've never used fuel from only one tank in flight. Why would someone do that? Also, why is the fuel selector set to one tank during refueling? Is it to minimize crossfeeding? Thanks, Alex |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F-104 in Viet Nam Question | Don Harstad | Military Aviation | 2 | August 28th 04 09:40 AM |
| Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944 | Bernardz | Military Aviation | 205 | July 22nd 04 06:31 PM |
| IFR Checkride Checklist | BTIZ | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 18th 04 01:06 AM |
| Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 10:14 AM |
| Tanks for nothing (repost from Bearhawk list) | Del Rawlins | Home Built | 0 | August 6th 03 04:06 AM |