WOW, look at this engine

http://www.greenengtech.com/index.htm

Click on the "English" button on the left.

The company claims it's a revolutionary six-stroke rotary engine.
120hp, 60lbs. Are they kidding me or what?

Check out the two-o'clock photo under applications.

http://www.greenengtech.com/application.htm

I wonder if they're in the same league.


"Shin Gou" wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.greenengtech.com/index.htm

Click on the "English" button on the left.

The company claims it's a revolutionary six-stroke rotary engine.
120hp, 60lbs. Are they kidding me or what?

I hope this is for real, but I somehow doubt it, it's probably one of
those neverending development projects. Also, with that little weight
compared to comprable powered engines, unless an aircraft is
specifically designed for this engine just for weight and balance's
sake you'd have to put at least 100 pounds of dead weight on the nose
or move the engine forward a good couple of feet.

Steve Foley wrote:
Check out the two-o'clock photo under applications.

http://www.greenengtech.com/application.htm

I wonder if they're in the same league.


"Shin Gou" wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.greenengtech.com/index.htm

Click on the "English" button on the left.

The company claims it's a revolutionary six-stroke rotary engine.
120hp, 60lbs. Are they kidding me or what?

wrote in message
oups.com...
I hope this is for real, but I somehow doubt it, it's probably one of
those neverending development projects. Also, with that little weight
compared to comprable powered engines, unless an aircraft is
specifically designed for this engine just for weight and balance's
sake you'd have to put at least 100 pounds of dead weight on the nose
or move the engine forward a good couple of feet.

Shoot, if that is the only problem, just stack the rotors, and make an
engine with 4 times the power, or whatever is needed for it to weigh the
same as the engine it is replacing. More power is seldom a BIG problem, if
it does not weigh too much.

I hope this engine is for real, and it comes to market. It does look
interesting, and possible, to me.
--
Jim in NC

"Shin Gou" wrote ...
http://www.greenengtech.com/index.htm

Click on the "English" button on the left.

The company claims it's a revolutionary six-stroke rotary engine.
120hp, 60lbs. Are they kidding me or what?


Why would you believe *anything* this company tells you? Here you have an
engine that hasn't even run, that can't be lighter or more efficient than a
fourstroke and who's principale are seeking investors and customers to send
them money for an idea that doesn't exist, yet you're ready endorse them?
Magic engines come and go but they never work. From an engineering point of
view, the world is the way the world is for a reason. You can push at the
side box but you can't jump out of it.

This unpopular viewpoint brought to you by:
Rich

Yup. This attempt to attract "Green" investors is getting pretty close to
the equivilant of the 419 Nigerian scam emails we all keep getting.
www.ebolamonkeyman.com

MJC
"Richard Isakson" wrote in message
...
"Shin Gou" wrote ...
http://www.greenengtech.com/index.htm

Click on the "English" button on the left.

The company claims it's a revolutionary six-stroke rotary engine.
120hp, 60lbs. Are they kidding me or what?


Why would you believe *anything* this company tells you? Here you have an
engine that hasn't even run, that can't be lighter or more efficient than
a
fourstroke and who's principale are seeking investors and customers to
send
them money for an idea that doesn't exist, yet you're ready endorse them?
Magic engines come and go but they never work. From an engineering point
of
view, the world is the way the world is for a reason. You can push at the
side box but you can't jump out of it.

This unpopular viewpoint brought to you by:
Rich

Richard Isakson wrote:
"Shin Gou" wrote ...
http://www.greenengtech.com/index.htm

Click on the "English" button on the left.

The company claims it's a revolutionary six-stroke rotary engine.
120hp, 60lbs. Are they kidding me or what?


Why would you believe *anything* this company tells you? Here you have an
engine that hasn't even run, that can't be lighter or more efficient than a
fourstroke and who's principale are seeking investors and customers to send
them money for an idea that doesn't exist, yet you're ready endorse them?
Magic engines come and go but they never work. From an engineering point of
view, the world is the way the world is for a reason. You can push at the
side box but you can't jump out of it.

This unpopular viewpoint brought to you by:
Rich

Yep, a perfect green engine. Infinitely efficent, cause it doesn't run.

Sport Pilot wrote:


Yep, a perfect green engine. Infinitely efficent, cause it doesn't run.

It must have been invented by Al Gore.

Tony

Anthony W wrote:
Sport Pilot wrote:


Yep, a perfect green engine. Infinitely efficent, cause it doesn't run.

It must have been invented by Al Gore.

Tony

Are you sure it's not an invention of mr. George dubbleU B.
A big hoax.

ower wrote:
Anthony W wrote:

Sport Pilot wrote:


Yep, a perfect green engine. Infinitely efficent, cause it doesn't run.

It must have been invented by Al Gore.

Tony


Are you sure it's not an invention of mr. George dubbleU B.
A big hoax.

No, I'm sure it has more to do with the guy that wrote a environmental
book full of junk science and said he invented the Internet.

Tony