A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rep vs. Dem Differences



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st 04, 08:46 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ne.com, Andrew
Gideon writes:

BillC85 wrote:

Just my two cents.


Sigh too true. But it wasn't always this way!

Once upon a time, a "political conservative" would have been apalled at the
notions expounded by religious zealots. Today, these terms of come to be
hopelessly intertwined. Annoying.

Similarly, once upon a time "democracy" was a liberal idea. Today,
"liberal" appears to carry all sorts of unrelated baggage.

What we really need are better labels.


WWW.LP.ORG

Take the World's Smallest Political quiz there.

YOu get a two axis political spectrum that describes your place better than
left/right

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #2  
Old August 31st 04, 08:57 PM
Rosspilot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Take the World's Smallest Political quiz there.

YOu get a two axis political spectrum that describes your place better than
left/right



I am WAY Libertarian . . . 80% on social issues and 100% on economic.


www.Rosspilot.com


  #3  
Old September 5th 04, 05:44 AM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Weir wrote in message . ..
In an on-the-air (*) broadcast, a BBC announcer was trying to explain the
difference between the Republicans and the Democrats to his British audience.

"The Republicans are verry like our ... ahhh ... Conservatives.
The Democrats are verry like our ... ahhh ... Conservatives."

(*) "on-the-AIR" makes this on-topic {;-)


My understanding is that the democratic party was not liberal enough
for the Canadians. They now have a liberal party in addition to the
democrat party.
If you feel guilty that you have the means to fly an airplane, you are
a democrat.
If you feel proud that you have succeeded enough in life to afford a
plane, you are a republican.
  #4  
Old September 5th 04, 06:41 AM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
If you feel guilty that you have the means to fly an airplane, you are
a democrat.
If you feel proud that you have succeeded enough in life to afford a
plane, you are a republican.


These generalizations! They're all BS, "wishful thinking" or pure
propaganda.


  #5  
Old September 5th 04, 07:33 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message

These generalizations! They're all BS, "wishful thinking" or pure
propaganda.

You are so right! No pilots are brain dead enough to be true Democrats! G
(ducking while running)
--
Jim in NC


  #6  
Old September 5th 04, 12:23 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are so right! No pilots are brain dead enough to be true Democrats!
G
(ducking while running)


Nah, it just means we're older and wiser.

What was that saying Churchill coined? "If you're not a liberal at age 20,
you have no heart. If you're not a Conservative at age 40, you have no
brain..."
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #7  
Old September 6th 04, 04:53 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Jay Honeck wrote:

What was that saying Churchill coined? "If you're not a liberal at age 20,
you have no heart. If you're not a Conservative at age 40, you have no
brain..."


Lord Chesterfield said "He who is not a revolutionary at 16 has no heart. He who is a
revolutionary at 60 has no head." If Churchill said what you posted, that's where he
got it.

George Patterson
If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people
he gives it to.
  #8  
Old September 5th 04, 07:15 PM
Icebound
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
My understanding is that the democratic party was not liberal enough
for the Canadians. They now have a liberal party in addition to the
democrat party.



The "Liberals" in Canada are actually the middle-of-the-road party. It is
the "Democrats" (actually "New Democratic" Party) which is the most
"left-leaning".


Canadian politics morphs over time.

The "basic" Candian sentiment is:

a "Conservative" party that is similar to USA Republicans with a
"conservative" fiscal and military platform, and perhaps a
only-slightly-less conservative social policy. A "Conservative" government
was responsible for the USA-Canada NAFTA agreement, but was decimated
electorally in 1993.

a "Liberal" party which is middle of the road, shading towards a
"conservative" fiscal policy, moderate military policy, fairly liberal
social policy. Many complain that this Liberal party is just as
"conservative" as the "Conservatives". THIS is the "natural" governing
party and has governed Canada for the majority of years, including
1993-present.

a "Democratic" party, which is actually the most left-leaning party in all
aspects. They have routinely been the party with the fewest seats
federally, although they have frequently formed governments in one or more
Provinces. This party morphed from labor activism in the dirty thirties.
Their previous incarnation managed to gain power in a single province in
1944 and were the first to institute universal medicare, starting with
hospital care in 1947 and medical (Doctor) services in 1962. Eventually,
this was accepted as a "good" thing, and universal medicare was accepted
nationally in 1966 and supported by all parties to some degree.

In recent years, regional squabbles have intensifed. The "Conservatives"
were not "conservative" enough (especially socially) for the rich
oil-producing provinces, and a more-right-leaning party was created, more
like a true Republican party. (Quebec had their own agenda and created a
"Quebec only" conservative-leaning party. Etc..) At one point the original
Conservatives were decimated and the new version ended up with a significant
portion of the vote. But vote-splitting between the two right-wing parties
ensured that the centre-of-the-road "Liberals" would remain as the governing
party forever.

So the Conservatives (except for the Quebec version) have re-joined into a
single party once more. Their platform is still nebulous since this newest
version has never actually governed; we have yet to see what their actual
policies might be.

In the most recent election (this summer), therefore, renewed interest in
the combined "Conservatives"... and vote-splitting between the
centre-of-road "Liberals", and the left-leaning "Democrats".... has left no
party with a majority of seats in Parliament. The "Liberals" retain the
most seats, the "Conservatives" next, then the Quebec-conservatives, and the
"Democrats" the fewest. The first sessions since the election are yet to
convene; it is believed some sort of coalition between the "Liberals" and
"Democrats" will be able to govern.

Such "minority" governments are not new in Canada, and in fact, have
produced some "ground-breaking" legislation because of the compromises
required to maintain a voting majority. Universal Medicare, to a certain
extent, was implemented federally because of a minority government.



--
*** A great civilization is not conquered from without until it
has destroyed itself from within. ***
- Ariel Durant 1898-1981


  #9  
Old September 7th 04, 08:46 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Icebound" wrote in message .rogers.com...
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
My understanding is that the democratic party was not liberal enough
for the Canadians. They now have a liberal party in addition to the
democrat party.



The "Liberals" in Canada are actually the middle-of-the-road party. It is
the "Democrats" (actually "New Democratic" Party) which is the most
"left-leaning".


Canadian politics morphs over time.

The "basic" Candian sentiment is:


Very interesting. Thanks! When my wife and I flew our Mooney out to
Vancouver this summer there were elections taking place at the time.
We tried to ask people in the hotel what the differences were between
the parties but none of them really seemed to know. I guess it gets
confusing when you have so many choices.

-Robert
  #10  
Old September 8th 04, 12:36 AM
CB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
"Icebound" wrote in message
.rogers.com...
"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
My understanding is that the democratic party was not liberal enough
for the Canadians. They now have a liberal party in addition to the
democrat party.



The "Liberals" in Canada are actually the middle-of-the-road party. It
is
the "Democrats" (actually "New Democratic" Party) which is the most
"left-leaning".


Canadian politics morphs over time.

The "basic" Candian sentiment is:


Very interesting. Thanks! When my wife and I flew our Mooney out to
Vancouver this summer there were elections taking place at the time.
We tried to ask people in the hotel what the differences were between
the parties but none of them really seemed to know. I guess it gets
confusing when you have so many choices.


Its so much easier when the choice is between the devil and the deep blue
sea. Either way your stuffed.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aluminum differences Lou Parker Home Built 16 August 25th 04 07:48 PM
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? carlos Owning 17 January 29th 04 09:55 PM
differences in loc/dme and loc with dme appch at KRUT? Richard Hertz Instrument Flight Rules 19 January 25th 04 08:49 PM
Differences in models of Foster500 loran Ray Andraka Owning 1 September 3rd 03 11:47 PM
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster Morgans Home Built 3 August 6th 03 05:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.