FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs

Mxsmanic wrote:

Emily writes:

I don't know....$1.6 million isn't anything to the city, and Daley would
do it again in a heartbeat, even knowing he'd be fined.

He knows he has popular support. Most people would be more interested
in a park than in an airport.

Wasn't Meigs prominently featured in that Microsoft flight game?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fred wrote:
Mxsmanic wrote:

Emily writes:

I don't know....$1.6 million isn't anything to the city, and Daley would
do it again in a heartbeat, even knowing he'd be fined.

He knows he has popular support. Most people would be more interested
in a park than in an airport.

Wasn't Meigs prominently featured in that Microsoft flight game?

Up to and including MS Flight Simulator 2002, yes. It was the
default starting location for all flights. It was changed to KSEA in
FS2004.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFF2gByBkZmuMZ8L8RAuo9AKDYLIek9aVumg2iIyEqQp vAknunqwCfcSfY
VoOpB0P0+SVZMJuXHUIoZQU=
=o1lh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Fred writes:

Wasn't Meigs prominently featured in that Microsoft flight game?

Yes, but only a tiny minority of the population uses that flight game.
Even so, they probably outnumber pilots by ten or a hundred to one.
And overall, both groups together don't even make a dent in the
demographics of the overall population.

In other words, most people would say yes to a park, and no to an
airport.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message

At last, justice is done, and the criminals have been fined.

Are you kidding? Justice? Chicago gets 50 acres, m/l, of prime waterfront
land for 1.6 million. I'd take that deal any day of the week, and twice on
Sundays. Just wait a few years, til they figure a way to do away with the
park and auction off development rights. You'll see big, big smiles in the
Mayor's office, and a mile of 40 story condos.

John Gaquin writes:

Are you kidding? Justice? Chicago gets 50 acres, m/l, of prime waterfront
land for 1.6 million. I'd take that deal any day of the week, and twice on
Sundays. Just wait a few years, til they figure a way to do away with the
park and auction off development rights. You'll see big, big smiles in the
Mayor's office, and a mile of 40 story condos.

Maybe. Is that land on bedrock, or is it reclaimed from the water? A
40-story building requires very solid foundations, much more so than a
runway.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

Maybe. Is that land on bedrock, or is it reclaimed from the water? A
40-story building requires very solid foundations, much more so than a
runway.


Northerly Island was made from dredging spoils. Most of the present
lakeshore area rests on rubble from the 1871 fire. The lakeshore at that
time was just east of the parallel rail line.

Steven P. McNicoll writes:

Northerly Island was made from dredging spoils. Most of the present
lakeshore area rests on rubble from the 1871 fire.

Sounds fine for a runway, but I wouldn't want to build skyscrapers on
it.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

Mxsmanic wrote:

John Gaquin writes:

Are you kidding? Justice? Chicago gets 50 acres, m/l, of prime waterfront
land for 1.6 million. I'd take that deal any day of the week, and twice on
Sundays. Just wait a few years, til they figure a way to do away with the
park and auction off development rights. You'll see big, big smiles in the
Mayor's office, and a mile of 40 story condos.

Maybe. Is that land on bedrock, or is it reclaimed from the water? A
40-story building requires very solid foundations, much more so than a
runway.

Reclaimed from water, just like Boston's back bay section. Certainly hasn't been
an obstacle to building skyscrapers *there*!

"Fred" wrote in message ...


Reclaimed from water, just like Boston's back bay section. Certainly hasn't
been
an obstacle to building skyscrapers *there*!

Same for a significant portion of downtown San Francisco.

Vaughn