![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, rather than bitching about the world turning to a gasahol blend of some sort (which it seems to be doing) let's light a fire under those who hold the STCs to determine WHY gasahol is bad for the aircraft environment and do something about it. Bravo! I've been asking this for years, to no avail. What the heck is in an aircraft engine/fuel system that can't be made "ethanol safe" for more than a few bucks worth of rubber seals? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jay Honeck wrote:
So, rather than bitching about the world turning to a gasahol blend of some sort (which it seems to be doing) let's light a fire under those who hold the STCs to determine WHY gasahol is bad for the aircraft environment and do something about it. Bravo! I've been asking this for years, to no avail. What the heck is in an aircraft engine/fuel system that can't be made "ethanol safe" for more than a few bucks worth of rubber seals? Really. Solve the problem, not the symptom. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"JohnH" wrote: What the heck is in an aircraft engine/fuel system that can't be made "ethanol safe" for more than a few bucks worth of rubber seals? Really. Solve the problem, not the symptom. It seems like the problem is excessive regulation, leading to shortages in supply. The sumptom is a fabricated need for products like "gasohol." So I'm all for solving the problem. JKG |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jay Honeck" writes:
What the heck is in an aircraft engine/fuel system that can't be made "ethanol safe" for more than a few bucks worth of rubber seals? A pilot. Aviation is full of old farts who will latch on to some anecdote about something being unsafe. They'll stop right there instead of investigating to get good information. Even the thoughtful pilots will often get shot down in their quest for good information. http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...14f6e1df76730c My guess is that you'll have to wait for a new generation of pilots to fully embrace ethanol. --kyler |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't Brazil flying a Cessna with gasahol or something like that?
------------- Regards, Ross C-172F 180HP KSWI RST Engineering wrote: So, rather than bitching about the world turning to a gasahol blend of some sort (which it seems to be doing) let's light a fire under those who hold the STCs to determine WHY gasahol is bad for the aircraft environment and do something about it. I do not quite understand why gasahol burns well in old Ford tractors that use Marvel carburetors and is prohibited in aircraft with Marvel carburetors, other than some bureaucrat with a bad comb-over deciding it is so. And, if there IS some sort of special part in the fuel system that is attacked by ethanol, it isn't rocket science to specify a material for that part that is NOT eaten by alcohol. We can attack the problem politically and get buried under sheer numbers of farmers vs. pilots or we can attack the problem with engineering and solve it. Simply kvetching that we won't be able to play with our toy airplanes like we used to be able to do isn't going to cut it. Just like "pilots without medicals" (LSA) was denied for years, we CAN get something done if we want it bad enough. Jim |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ross Richardson" wrote in message ... Isn't Brazil flying a Cessna with gasahol or something like that? Actually, they have a new aircraft produced specifically to run on *ethanol*, and they have "300 to 400" small aircraft which have been *converted* from gasoline to ethanol: http://www.bellona.no/en/energy/37677.html |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
RST Engineering wrote:
I do not quite understand why gasahol burns well in old Ford tractors that use Marvel carburetors and is prohibited in aircraft with Marvel carburetors, other than some bureaucrat with a bad comb-over deciding it is so. What I've read in a number of places is that there are problems with issues similar to vapor lock in aircraft. Since gasahol doesn't seem to be causing problems in cars that cross the Rockies, it seems to me that this wouldn't be a proble for a pilot who rarely exceeds 10,000' ASL. If vapor problems are actually the issue, perhaps an STC with altitude limits is in order? George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim,
You are right that we can attack the problem with scientific and enginering studies. My quick search showed quite a few articles relating to the subject 1. http://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2005/t...ram/P18201.HTM "Effects of Ethanol as a Fuel Additive on General Aviation Aircraft Fuel System Electrochemical Corrosion" If you have the time, you can read the whole dissertation here http://library.msstate.edu/etd/show....1072004-122317 then with your ingenuity and entrepreneural spirit, you can team up with Dr. Xie to market a X-ray/Whiskey mystery oil for gasohol use in GA aircraft ;-) 2. http://www.westbioenergy.org/dec2003/08.htm "Can 85 Percent Ethanol Gasoline Replace Aviation Fuel?" 3. http://www.westbioenergy.org/reports...55029final.htm "Airframe & Engine Modification and Testing Leading to FAA Certification of AGE-85" 4. http://www.ncga.com/ethanol/main/energy.htm "Ethanol-Based Aviation Fuel: Extensive research has shown that an aviation fuel blend containing 85 percent ethanol offers superior performance in prop-driven aircraft. The Federal Aviation Administration and several universities are conducting research on ethanol-based aviation fuel to determine the feasibility of the fuel as an alternative to the leaded aviation fuel currently being used." 5. http://bioproducts-bioenergy.gov/pdf...ts/26/z313.pdf "Engine endurance tests showed considerably less wear on ethanol than on avgas. Consequently, it is estimated that the Time Between Overhaul (TBO) in an engine on ethanol could easily be extended by 100% over avgas." Hai Longworth |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are right that we can attack the problem with scientific and
enginering studies. My quick search showed quite a few articles relating to the subject 1. http://aiche.confex.com/aiche/2005/t...ram/P18201.HTM "Effects of Ethanol as a Fuel Additive on General Aviation Aircraft Fuel System Electrochemical Corrosion" Big Snip of lots of good stuff Thanks, Hai, for posting. This is great stuff! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:46:47 GMT, "Jay Honeck"
wrote in b3c_e.369489$x96.190155@attbi_s72:: if you make regular unleaded gasoline unavailable in Iowa, you will make it impossible for many of us to fly our small airplanes Of course, this is an exaggeration. I've never used Mo-gas, and have been flying aircraft who's engines were designed for 80/87 decades. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ethanol Powered Airplane Certified In Brazil | Victor | Owning | 4 | March 30th 05 10:10 PM |
| Sugar-powered plane unveiled | Mal | Soaring | 12 | October 26th 04 08:49 AM |
| Local Amoco now blending ethanol | Ben Smith | Owning | 5 | April 1st 04 05:37 PM |