If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Alaska Senator Supports User Fees For All EXCEPT Alaska Pilots
How do these arrogant, self-serving, simpleminded politicians manage
to get elected? Doesn't Senator Stevens realize that his token exemption will be overturned as soon as the bill is enacted? Doesn't he realize that he has become the first evidence of the user fee proponents' divide and conquer strategy? STEVENS TRIES TO EXEMPT ALASKA PILOTS FROM USER FEES Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, vice chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, voted against the Nelson/Sununu amendment that would have stripped the $25 user fee out of S.1300, the Senate's FAA reauthorization bill, but he secured an exemption for many Alaskan aviators. The hotly debated anti-user-fee amendment, supported by general aviation lobbying groups, was defeated by the committee by Stevens' tie-breaking vote. "I am concerned that this legislation as originally drafted places an undue burden on too many small carriers in rural parts of America, including Alaska," he said in a news release (http://stevens.senate.gov/public/ind...id=&Issue_id=). Stevens said he voted in favor of the bill even though it contained an aviation user fee, according to KTUU.com (http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp...nav=menu510_2), because killing it would have forced discussion of FAA funding to start all over again. "I don't like the user-fee concept, but the way it's been worked out now, it is a fair thing," Stevens said. Dee Hanson, executive director of the Alaska Airmen's Association, told AVweb on Tuesday that while she appreciates Sen. Stevens' work to exempt rural Alaskan aviators, she fears the expansion of user fees both in Alaska and in the rest of the country. "Our members also fly in the Lower 48," she said. "An exemption is a temporary fix. We oppose changing how the FAA is funded over to a user-fee basis, and the known fact is that user fees for IFR services have the potential to erode safety. We will continue to fight this." http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#195309 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airborne hazards in Alaska | Kingfish | Piloting | 7 | February 1st 07 04:38 PM |
Alaska Soaring | Mike I Green | Soaring | 13 | August 20th 06 03:47 PM |
Flying to Alaska info | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | May 25th 05 11:25 PM |
Soaring in Alaska | keithw | Soaring | 1 | December 29th 04 05:57 PM |
Jobs in Alaska | gpsposter | Piloting | 4 | January 28th 04 02:55 AM |