If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
David Megginson wrote: (K. Ari Krupnikov) writes: I guess I was trying to ask a more general question. Forget the context. If you are cleared direct to your destination, what point are you cleared to? As far as I understand, you have no clearance limit. Sure you do, the airport. Just like when you are sitting on the ground and get your clearance, you are cleared to the airport. If you lose comms and cannot go VFR, then you just fly to your destination and shoot an approach, no holds required. Just like normal. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Thomas wrote: The reason for this is Air Traffic is expecting you to arrive at the airport at that ETA so they will have cleared the airspace in its entirity, Not in its entirety, but we will make room for you. expecting you to start any published instrument approach into the airport. This is particularly relevant if your transponder has also failed... how are Air Traffic supposed to know where you are? Radar. Of course if you are in VMC conditions then you'd stay in VMC and land as soon as practicable. After landing informing Air Traffic by telephone so they aren't any more incovenienced than they need to be. Call me when you figure out you are NORDO and we can dispense with all this mumbo jumbo. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard Thomas" wrote:
If you are now 30 minutes ahead of schedule (great tailwind) then they may still be clearing the approaches... if you then start an ILS approach in solid IMC, there could be a possibility of ploughing straight into another aircraft that they are getting onto the ground in anticipation of your arrival 30 minutes later... How does holding at the Final Approach Fix for 30 minutes make the situation any better? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
David Megginson writes:
(K. Ari Krupnikov) writes: While it doesn't make a bit of a difference from 150 miles out, if you reach the clearance limit and have no communication with ATC, and reach it before your ETA, where are you going to hold? Over one of the runway thresholds? The IAF for your approach, I guess. Which one? You were never cleared for an approach, you didn't hear "expect". There may be multiple published approaches with different IAFs. In real life, do controllers really want a 7600 holding for 15 minutes because it's ahead of its ETA, or do they just want it safely on the ground as soon as possible so that it stops messing up their airspace? How would they know what that "as soon as possible" happens? Will they effectively close the airport waiting for you to arrive? There might be traffic waiting to get in or out, and nobody wants 7600's flying into any of those. Would you hold all departures and divert all arrivals waiting for the 7600 to make her approach "as soon as possible"? Ari. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
"David Megginson" wrote in message ... As far as I understand, you have no clearance limit. If you lose comms and cannot go VFR, then you just fly to your destination and shoot an approach, no holds required. A proper IFR clearance always has a clearance limit. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"David Megginson" wrote in message ... The IAF for your approach, I guess. In real life, do controllers really want a 7600 holding for 15 minutes because it's ahead of its ETA, or do they just want it safely on the ground as soon as possible so that it stops messing up their airspace? They want you on the ground, and they certainly don't want you squawking 7600 while you're putting it there. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"K. Ari Krupnikov" wrote in message ... Which one? Whichever one your little heart desires. How would they know what that "as soon as possible" happens? Will they effectively close the airport waiting for you to arrive? There might be traffic waiting to get in or out, and nobody wants 7600's flying into any of those. Would you hold all departures and divert all arrivals waiting for the 7600 to make her approach "as soon as possible"? If you've still got a radar target you can still separate from a NORDO aircraft. If you've got no radar then everything beneath the NORDO is effectively shut down until it's known to be on the ground. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard Thomas" wrote in message ... Hi Steven, Howzit goin'? I wouldn't like to be on your aeroplane if you're not going to hold anywhere if you're 30 minutes early arriving at your destination with lost comms etc... :-) Why not? If you are in IMC and loose communication then one should start any available instrument approach into the destination airport at the ETA within the filed flight plan (ETD + Time Enroute). If you're early and its solid IMC you hold. Simple as that. The reason for this is Air Traffic is expecting you to arrive at the airport at that ETA so they will have cleared the airspace in its entirity, expecting you to start any published instrument approach into the airport. This is particularly relevant if your transponder has also failed... how are Air Traffic supposed to know where you are? I see a couple of problems with that. First, it's unlikely ATC has your ETA. They'd only have it if you were cleared as filed and there had been no route amendments since you departed. That's rarely the case. Second, what bizarre failure causes me to lose both of my completely independent transceivers, and my transponder, but leaves me fully confident of the continued flawless operation of my other avionics? If you arrive, lets say 30 minutes ahead of schedule, you have no comms and as its your very unlucky day your transponder has decided to go unservicable. ATC have no idea where you are but as they will be following the FARs they'll be clearing the area for your planned ETA. If you are now 30 minutes ahead of schedule (great tailwind) then they may still be clearing the approaches... if you then start an ILS approach in solid IMC, there could be a possibility of ploughing straight into another aircraft that they are getting onto the ground in anticipation of your arrival 30 minutes later... So if I arrive 30 minutes early I should hold while arrival and departure traffic fly through my holding pattern? I'm familiar with what the FARs and the AIM say. What I say comes from 20 years experience as an air traffic controller, Center, TRACON, and tower. You can believe what I tell you, or you can believe your fantasies, I don't care which. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" writes:
Whichever one your little heart desires. And here I was, thinking I had people convinced I had a large heart. I hate it when people call my bluff. If you've still got a radar target you can still separate from a NORDO aircraft. If you've got no radar then everything beneath the NORDO is effectively shut down until it's known to be on the ground. If you are NORDO, your mode C might not work either... How would ATC know who's below it? Ari. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Screw hold repair in fabric? | Brian Huffaker | Home Built | 11 | May 29th 04 02:07 AM |
Need Hold Harmless Waver for Ultralight or Experimental Sale | Larry Smith | Home Built | 9 | August 19th 03 02:47 AM |
Need a Waiver/ Hold Harmless Agreement for UL / Experimental Sale | Richard_Tonry | Home Built | 2 | August 17th 03 12:58 PM |