If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-04-03 11:13:59 -0400, "Helowriter" said:
Apaches were closed out of Kosovo in part by radar-directed threats, and RF MANPADS in the future are not out of the question. 1. Most of what kept TF Hawk (i believe it was called) out of Kosovo was the Army's characteristic really, really, REALLY bad staff work. Note that where employed, the Apaches have protected the lives of the crews but throw an Apache battalion against a hard-fighting enemy armed with anything bigger than spitballs and the unit loses combat effectiveness. The Pentagon is busted. It is all about buying weapons, but every weapon they buy is supposed to replace two others, costs five times as much, etc. etc. All of this brings us back to the original topic - the Presidential Helicopter... The Navy just chose the biggest box f 2. My source (which is in Sikorsky) says that they were told that the project required a specific piece of classified equipment which did not fit in the S-92 airframe. Since the dimensions of the cargo compartment are functionally identical except for length, my personal assessment of that is: bull****. 3. You have mentioned the pending AF HH-x competition. Any of the contenders, even the NH-90, would be a quantum improvement over the H-60, which is currently striving hard and falling short in that role, but the proposal seems to have been written to require the EH 101. It looks like the fix is in. 4. The other fella mentioned Comanche as a technology program. Sikorsky has certainly salvaged what it could from it. The rotor on the -92 and the new rotor for the S-76D incorporate aerodynamic knowledge that came from the Comanche project. 5. Part of the problem is the consolidation of the aerospace and defence industry that was forced by the DOD of the nineties. An incredibly dumb decision that put skilled people out of work and brain-drained the industry by some fifty to seventy percent, on top of downsizing-driven losses. Now the DOD has a cartel of two contractors to buy from on most projects. Sikorsky is rare in hanging on to its independence. Can it, after a couple more contracts get dealt overseas for political reasons? Contrast this with the UK MOD decision on a replacement for aging battlefield and naval helicopters. They went sole-source to Agusta Westland. -- cheers -=K=- Rule #1: Don't hit anything big. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 11 | February 8th 05 02:20 PM |
Flying high: Lockheed wins presidential helicopter contract | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 0 | January 30th 05 03:48 AM |
Lockheed wins Presidential helicopter contract | Tiger | Naval Aviation | 0 | January 29th 05 05:24 AM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 6 | February 27th 04 09:11 AM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 0 | February 25th 04 06:39 PM |