If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
F/A-22 IRST?
In a white paper from the Lexington Institute, it is claimed (most
likely by Loren Thompson, the Lexingtin Institute defense analyst and resident Raptor cheerleader) that the F/A-22 has an Infrared Search and Track capability. Specifically, on page 8 of the attachment below, the following passage: "The sensor usually described in open sources is the main radar — an electronically steered array that can simultaneously provide surveillance, fire control, jamming and other functions. However, Raptor also carries other sensors such as an infrared surveillance and tracking system that are seldom discussed." I have never read this anywhere else. Does Dr. Thompson know something the rest of the non-classified world doesn't? Does anyone else have any info on this? Or is he just blowing smoke up our collective keisters? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Zaharis" wrote in message om... In a white paper from the Lexington Institute, it is claimed (most likely by Loren Thompson, the Lexingtin Institute defense analyst and resident Raptor cheerleader) that the F/A-22 has an Infrared Search and Track capability. Specifically, on page 8 of the attachment below, the following passage: "The sensor usually described in open sources is the main radar - an electronically steered array that can simultaneously provide surveillance, fire control, jamming and other functions. However, Raptor also carries other sensors such as an infrared surveillance and tracking system that are seldom discussed." I have never read this anywhere else. Does Dr. Thompson know something the rest of the non-classified world doesn't? Does anyone else have any info on this? Or is he just blowing smoke up our collective keisters? The F-22 was to have an IRST, but it was subsequently deleted from the program. There has been some amount of informed speculation that with the name change to "F/A-22", a targeting FLIR will instead be mounted internally. See: www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/ channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/sb03_16.xml Brooks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
(Harry Andreas) wrote in message ...
In article , (Mike Zaharis) wrote: "The sensor usually described in open sources is the main radar ? an electronically steered array that can simultaneously provide surveillance, fire control, jamming and other functions. However, Raptor also carries other sensors such as an infrared surveillance and tracking system that are seldom discussed." The term "infrared surveillance and tracking system" can cover a lot of ground. For instance, a MAWS falls under that description. IRST isn't the only thing that used IR. This is what has me confused by his terminology. I wasn't sure if, by using the phrase "infrared surveillance and tracking system", he meant to say "infrared search and tracking system". I kind of wonder if this is a specific misinterpretation that the author was hoping for. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:11:54 -0400, Kevin Brooks wrote:
The F-22 was to have an IRST, but it was subsequently deleted from the program. Do you happen to know why? -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (Email: zen19725 at zen dot co dot uk) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"phil hunt" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:11:54 -0400, Kevin Brooks wrote: The F-22 was to have an IRST, but it was subsequently deleted from the program. Do you happen to know why? IIRC, it was mostly money and project timeline concerns; it was thought that as the aircraft's primary weapons and other sensors adequately (or more than adequately) support its BVR mission, and along with its stealthiness, that it was not a "have to have" item in the initial operational version. It may have also been influenced by sensor fusion concerns--it will already have what is probably the most complex and ambitious sensor fusion capability flying, and adding another sensor into the mix could have been more trouble than it is worth at this time. I believe the IRST will likely be included in future spirals, and a FLIR/target designation capability will undoubtedly be added in the first spiral. Brooks |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Having used an IRSTS in the F102A for over a year and a half (and
teaching its use to other pilots) I am continually amazed at the refusal of the USAF and USN to employ some form of IRSTS in their fighters. As simple and crude as the Deuce's IR system was, it still added a whole new spectrum of attack modes to the weapons system. Undetectable, unjammable, good against fighters in the weeds, line of sight detection against head-on B58s at M 2.0 and picking up afterburning 106s at 40 miles head-on. Surely a 21st century IRSTS would be far superior to what we enjoyed back in the 60's. And the Deuce's system weighed less than 50 pounds all told . . . the powers that be might ask themselves why the Russians have IRSTS on all their fighters. Walt BJ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
WaltBJ wrote:
Having used an IRSTS in the F102A for over a year and a half (and teaching its use to other pilots) I am continually amazed at the refusal of the USAF and USN to employ some form of IRSTS in their fighters. Walt, the F-14 has had an IRSTS since the earlyt '80s, and the F-14D had both IRSTS and TCS. Modern FLIR pods can also do double duty as IRSTS, albeit they usually will be cued by radar. As simple and crude as the Deuce's IR system was, it still added a whole new spectrum of attack modes to the weapons system. Undetectable, unjammable, good against fighters in the weeds, line of sight detection against head-on B58s at M 2.0 and picking up afterburning 106s at 40 miles head-on. Surely a 21st century IRSTS would be far superior to what we enjoyed back in the 60's. And the Deuce's system weighed less than 50 pounds all told . . . the powers that be might ask themselves why the Russians have IRSTS on all their fighters. Part of the reason is that they were designed to operate under tight GCI, and their a/c radars were/are generally much inferior to US systems as far as performance goes. So, the ability to be vectored by GCI within range and then use a passive system for acquisition/tracking instead of letting the opposing pilots know their general direction (by RWR) where they're coming from,which allows the other side to radar search for them long before they reach their own detection range, probably plays a big part. As long as we feel we have the BVR range advantage, we don't want to close to IR missile range. In the case of the F-22 and even more the F-35, both of them will be getting a lot of their info from off-board sensors, as well passive sensors (the F-35 will have two internal FLIRS, one forward and the other downward-looking). And then there's always the money issue, which Kevin mentioned -- with the F-22 costs spiraling out of sight, I imagine they looked to cut the 'nice to have' stuff to try and keep the cost reasonable [Sic.] and make sure it gets into production, after which they can then load it up with all the goodies as retrofits. As to Russian IRSTS, I had a conversation with an aircrew/tech development type of a friendly power whose country was able to examine and evaluate the performance of the one on the MiG-29; he was distinctly underwhelmed, especially compared to some of the stuff his own airforce was using. He also wasn't terribly complementary about the MiG-29's high alpha guns tracking capability compared to western a/c (unacceptable amounts of buffet). Guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Delivery of Raptor delayed | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 48 | July 22nd 04 01:45 AM |