If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
"Thomas Schoene" wrote in message link.net... Simon Robbins wrote: "Charles Talleyrand" wrote in message ... I've just always wondered. What does a sonobouy cost. It seems one could use lots of them quicky, and there is no recovery mechanism. How expensive is all this? Not sure that I would be allowed to divulge costs, but they're pretty cheap, i.e. hundreds of pounds, rather than thousands. As a rule of thumb, active buoys tend to cost more than passive, and generally speaking the greater the number of hydrophones, the more expensive they are. But the greater cost is I'm sure fielding the aircraft to drop and monitor them. In the US, you can find the contract award with numebrs and total contract costs as public information. For example: Sparton Defense Electronics, DeLeon Springs, Fla., is being awarded a $7,136,416 firm-fixed-price contract for 6,303 AN/SSQ-62E sonobuoys and associated data. http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2..._ct075-03.html That's a bit over a thousand dollars each (earlier contracts were similar, in the range of $900 to $1300, usually). But the SSQ-62E is a directional active (DICASS) buoy, about the most sophisticated type available. Still, the cost has always been a concern and the Navy has made many efforts to field cheaper buoys for initial searches. While it's attractive to imagine laying patterns of buoys every hour or so in front of a convoy, the sheer inventory needed for this is daunting. NATO could have run out very fast in a notional WW3 Battle of the Atlantic. -- Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail "If brave men and women never died, there would be nothing special about bravery." -- Andy Rooney (attributed) I visited Sparton Defense Electronics once (Sept '92), with another DOD employee. We had been at Homestead as part of the team investigating the damage, and stopped so he could visit some contacts. I remember being surprised at the small size of their plant. Having dealt with the aircraft manufactures I guess I expected the usual large defense contractor with an complex of buildings covering several hundred-thousand square feet. Instead it wasn't any larger than many industrial buildings found in any small city/large town in the US or Canada. Heck every Mall I have seen was bigger. Red Rider Before anyone corrects our spelling it is Sparton, not Spartan. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4130 sheet source | Leon McAtee | Home Built | 7 | May 2nd 04 08:29 PM |
Transponder code switching | Ken Pruchnick | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | October 12th 03 08:31 PM |
"New" ASCC code names | Andreas Parsch | Military Aviation | 0 | September 9th 03 08:04 AM |
OT- north korean nuke weapon plutonium - source? | patrick mitchel | Military Aviation | 11 | August 31st 03 04:01 AM |
Source for copper crush gaskets??? | Jim | Home Built | 2 | August 22nd 03 09:44 PM |