If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Yet even before that date the RAF were fully operational
In April 1944 Bomber command flew 9700 sorties with a loss rate of 2.7%. After losing almost 100 aircraft in the Nuremburg raid of 3/31/44. It was only being put onto invasion related targets that saved Bomber Command from the perception of visible and humiliating defeat, and only "the favorable situation created by the Americans", that allowed Harris to make the rubble jump in German cities later in the war. Now, the Americans had a similar situation. After 10/14/43, it was conclusively shown that the unescorted bomber boxes couldn't operate over German targets without prohibitive loss. The Americans were able to interject a technological antidote -- the Mustang. Due to the nature of the British techniques and the unsuitability of their aircraft to being escorted the way the Americans could, the Brits could only get back over German targets after the Americans deprived the German air force of fuel. And I remind you that Galland said that deliveries of aviation fuel were inadequate before the RAF flew one sortie in the "Oil Campaign", and I further remind you that Harris sloughed off boming Oil targets as much as he dared. Walt |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
The USAAF started out with an obsession about "pinipoint:" bombing,
"putting the bomb in the pickle barrel from 20,000 feet." They ultimately made it work, too. "From Spaatz's point of view, the results of the May attacks on oil were outstanding. The Luftwaffe came up in strength, and Eisenhower soon got feedback through ULTRA that the effects on tlie Germans were dramatic. The military leaders of the Reich reacted immediately. They redeployed antiaircraft defenses hurriedly from the aircraft factories to these synthetic plants that had not yet been bombed. In addition, they changed the training programs of some of the ground units to conserve fuel and modified additional vehicles to. wood-burning propulsion systems. Though USSTAF could not at that moment be relieved of its responsibilities in the preparatory phases of OVERLORD, the combination of effects seems to have so impressed Eisenhower'that later in the summer he permitted additional oil attacks." --"Master of Airpower", David R. Mets. "The USSTAF and Bomber Command at last combined their offensives, the Eighth and Fifteenth Air Forces hitting synthetic oil plants while Bomber Command hammered targets in the Ruhr, where benzol was derived as a by-product of the coke ovens. In the process, an argument that had by now become academic was settled: precision bombing using the Norden bombsight could do more damage with 250 tons of bombs than could an attack using radar with 1,000 tons." -- "Clash of Wings" p. 346, by Walter J. Boyne "Despite all the terrible destruction of German cities, despite all the hardship and death it brought to the civilian population and industrial workers--whose ordeal was now often worse than the soldiers at the front--it was not,as we have seen, area bombing by night that struck the vital blow at German survival. This mission was accomplished to a far greater extent by the selective and precision bombing of the American Eighth Air Force in daylight. By careful choice of target, this first blocked the bottle-necks of armaments production, and finally brought the whole German war machine to a standstill." Luftwaffe War Diaries, p.340 by Cajus Bekker "After a survey of of Luftwaffe officers for "American Heritage", Carl Sulzberger found agreement with one German flying officer that "There is no doubt that the Americans harmed us most. The Russians were negligible as far as the home front was concerned, and we could have stood the British attacks on our cities. But the American devastation of our airfields, factories, and oil depots made it impossible for us to keep going." "A Wing and a Prayer", p. 384 by Harry Crosby. "In the course of the year 1943 the accent of the Reich defense shifted more and more toward action against daylight raiders. Even though numerically the British were still stronger than the Americans and were undoubtedly a great trial for for the civilian population, the American precision raids were of greater consequence to the war industry. They received priority attention over the British raids on our towns." "The First and the Last" p. 178, Adolf Galland Walt |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Do you realize that during the BoB, Bomber Command lost more men attacking continental targets, including Germany, than Fighter Command lost? Not a very stirring testimony. But it explains that the RAF was committed to bombing the Reich years before the US left its shores to join the party. Losses notwithstanding, Bomber Command was never turning back. Harris made a great statement when it was first suggested that they had "lost" the night battle - can't quote, but essentially, he said, "What we are doing amounts to the ONLY Allied offensive operation against Germany at this time." From June 1940 to June 1944, Bomber Command was the only Allied force in constant combat over the Reich, drawing resources away from Germany's countless other campaigns. The context of my note, which perhaps you just skimmed, or maybe I wasn't clear enough, was in the period following the invasion. Before during and after the invasion, Bomber Command was striking Germany. No heavy bomber raid was ever turned back, day or night, due to enemy action - yes, that includes the RAF. As for the Commonwealthians being unable to continue bombing, Portal never said that - he said it was *possible* that the situation would have gotten to that point; even as he wrote that, British bombers were in combat. And his statement ignores the mounting Mosquito raids that were by then causing the German leadership to remove large chunks of hair from their own heads... The Allied bombing campaign took on several facets and Portal's perhaps out of context or otherwise incomplete comments don't accurately reflect the reality that American air armadas required X amount of German assets to combat, while the night campaign required X amount as well - often it meant they could react to a daylight threat only by taking assets from the night war, and vice versa. The RAF suffered greatly but didn't quit - almost a mirror of the situation to when the Regensburg/Schweinfurt missions made it tactically impractical for the US to continue with large scale daylight penetrations without escorts. Allied bombing (not American, nor British) accomplished the deed of forcing the Luftwaffe to its knees, by continually rocking the old warrior with an indefensible combination of punches. No reason to try to demean the accomplishments of one force to raise up the other - they were fists wielded by the same boxer. v/r Gordon |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
But it explains that the RAF was committed to bombing the Reich years before
the US left its shores to join the party. Exactly. And the Germans are clear that the Americans hurt them much worse than the British did. Walt |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
"What we are doing amounts to the ONLY Allied offensive
operation against Germany at this time." Harris almost immolated his own force. He had a World War One mindset. But he -was- a 'Butcher' alright -- of his own men. Walt |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
From June 1940 to June 1944, Bomber
Command was the only Allied force in constant combat over the Reich, drawing resources away from Germany's countless other campaigns. You're on a roll. The effort the Germans had to expend to combat Bomber Command in no way strained them the way it strained the British to support Bomber Command. The Germans had boys, foreign soldiers, even women in their flak defenses. The British had hundreds of very very expensive aircraft and their finest young men involved. And the Germans defeated Bomber Command. Walt |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
The context of my note, which perhaps you
just skimmed, or maybe I wasn't clear enough, was in the period following the invasion. Before during and after the invasion, Bomber Command was striking Germany. After the Invasion, BC could only strike Germany because of the situation brought on by the Americans. No heavy bomber raid was ever turned back, day or night, due to enemy action - yes, that includes the RAF. So what? The British had to install cameras on their bombers to make sure the crews were not dropping their heavier bombs into the North Sea. As for the Commonwealthians being unable to continue bombing, Portal never said that - he said it was *possible* that the situation would have gotten to that point; even as he wrote that, British bombers were in combat. And his statement ignores the mounting Mosquito raids that were by then causing the German leadership to remove large chunks of hair from their own heads... You can't gansay Portal. Mosquito raids, right. The Allied bombing campaign took on several facets and Portal's perhaps out of context or otherwise incomplete comments You're welcome to show that. don't accurately reflect the reality that American air armadas required X amount of German assets to combat, while the night campaign required X amount as well - often it meant they could react to a daylight threat only by taking assets from the night war, and vice versa. You could argue that both the daylight and night raids expended much more in the way of blood and treasure than they returned. But the Germans are clear that the USAAF hurt them far worse than the RAF and they began redeploying the day fighter force back to Germay at a time when the average USAAF raid was only a few dozen heavy bombers and only striking in visual conditions. The RAF suffered greatly but didn't quit - almost a mirror of the situation to when the Regensburg/Schweinfurt missions made it tactically impractical for the US to continue with large scale daylight penetrations without escorts. The difference is that the Americans had a technological injection they could make -- the Mustang. Due to the nature of its aircraft and techniques and equipment, the RAF had no such fix. Allied bombing (not American, nor British) accomplished the deed of forcing the Luftwaffe to its knees, The effect on the Luftwaffe by the RAF during the run-up to the invasion was negligible. by continually rocking the old warrior with an indefensible combination of punches. No reason to try to demean the accomplishments of one force to raise up the other - they were fists wielded by the same boxer. Arthur Harris kept one hand tied behind the back of Bomber Command. it could have been much more effective under another leader. Walt v/r Gordon |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
The
Germans had boys, foreign soldiers, even women in their flak defenses. An 88mm set up to defend the Zeiss optics works is one that would not be available to the invasion front. Multiply that by thousands of 88s and every other caliber - these were being set up around various military targets in 1940-42, long before the stars and bars arrived overhead. The flakhelferrinnen did indeed include boys and women - although women usually served in other roles and boys were physically unable to lift and load an 88mm shell, so men were used that would otherwise be employed in the war effort elsewhere. The British had hundreds of very very expensive aircraft and their finest young men involved. And the Germans defeated Bomber Command. Just as the IJN defeated the USN at Pearl Harbor. Within a few months, the USN carried the fight right back to the heart of the enemy - I think that is the same situation at the RAF's costly, though short-term, loss against the Luftwaffe over Germany's cities. v/r Gordon- ====(A+C==== USN SAR Its always better to lose AN engine, than THE engine. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
"What we are doing amounts to the ONLY Allied offensive operation against Germany at this time." Harris almost immolated his own force. He had a World War One mindset. The 'chop rate' varied quite a bit throughout the night war, but Harris didn't do anything any differently than Nimitz, Halsey, or dozens of other Allied commanders: get in front of the enemy and prove you could outlast him. But he -was- a 'Butcher' alright -- of his own men. He traded the lives of 50,000 of his own men in order to keep Britain on offense, at a time when he was the only man in a position to do so. I'd agree with the title "butcher", however, I would say he and his force kept hundreds of thousands of flak, fighter, and support troops tied up before the first Boeing arrived. He had a bloody, ugly job to do and was rightly dispised for doing it his own way. Not a guy I'd ever want to work for - I think a personality like Bennett or Embry could have rallied the force to greater accomplishments. v/r Gordon ====(A+C==== USN SAR Its always better to lose AN engine, than THE engine. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | March 1st 04 07:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | February 1st 04 07:27 AM |
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | October 2nd 03 12:17 AM |
A Good Story | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 15 | September 3rd 03 03:00 PM |