If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pilot's Political Orientation
Flightinfo.com asked for pilots political orientation.
Results: Democrat 22.97% Republican 57.24% Ind. 19.79% http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthr...threadid=21699 -- Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Chicken Bone" wrote in message news.com... Flightinfo.com asked for pilots political orientation. Results: Democrat 22.97% Republican 57.24% Ind. 19.79% I suspect the results would have been more illuminating had they included the Libertarians and Greens as options. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Tony Cox" wrote in message link.net... I suspect the results would have been more illuminating had they included the Libertarians and Greens as options. How so? They'd both be included in the 19.79% that voted independent. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net... "Tony Cox" wrote in message link.net... I suspect the results would have been more illuminating had they included the Libertarians and Greens as options. How so? They'd both be included in the 19.79% that voted independent. Because "Ind." it isn't "Independent", its "Individual candidates/issues". In any case, I don't think of the Libs or Greens "independent." I'd have expected those who chose Libertarian would be a substantially higher proportion than the general population and the Greens substantially lower. Pilots are a self-reliant independent bunch, keen on driving machines whose gas consumption puts SUV's to shame. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Tony Cox" wrote in message link.net... Because "Ind." it isn't "Independent", its "Individual candidates/issues". Big deal. Isn't an Independent a person that votes for individual candidates and/or issues? The choices in this poll are essentially Democrat, Republican, and Other. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Tony Cox wrote:
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message link.net... "Tony Cox" wrote in message thlink.net... I suspect the results would have been more illuminating had they included the Libertarians and Greens as options. How so? They'd both be included in the 19.79% that voted independent. Because "Ind." it isn't "Independent", its "Individual candidates/issues". In any case, I don't think of the Libs or Greens "independent." I'd have expected those who chose Libertarian would be a substantially higher proportion than the general population and the Greens substantially lower. Pilots are a self-reliant independent bunch, Sounds to me like pilots are a lot like farmers, sqawking for the gumbit to cut their taxes and stay out of their "self-reliant" way, while refusing to acknowledge (even to themselves) the massive government spending, protection, and subsidies that make their activity economically feasible. (ducking) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"TTA Cherokee Driver" wrote in message ... Sounds to me like pilots are a lot like farmers, sqawking for the gumbit to cut their taxes and stay out of their "self-reliant" way, while refusing to acknowledge (even to themselves) the massive government spending, protection, and subsidies that make their activity economically feasible. What is this massive government spending, protection, and subsidy that makes flying economically feasible and what is the source? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Chicken Bone wrote:
Flightinfo.com asked for pilots political orientation. Weak troll, it's not hard to get this group riled up over politics. What difference does political affiliation make anyway? People can still have decent qualities despite being republicans. ---- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
How much did you pay the FAA last year, other than the same amount that
non-flyers in your tax bracket paid? "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message ink.net... "TTA Cherokee Driver" wrote in message ... Sounds to me like pilots are a lot like farmers, sqawking for the gumbit to cut their taxes and stay out of their "self-reliant" way, while refusing to acknowledge (even to themselves) the massive government spending, protection, and subsidies that make their activity economically feasible. What is this massive government spending, protection, and subsidy that makes flying economically feasible and what is the source? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In rec.aviation.owning Chicken Bone wrote:
Flightinfo.com asked for pilots political orientation. Results: Democrat 22.97% Republican 57.24% Ind. 19.79% http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthr...threadid=21699 -- Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke If you are under thirty and aren't a Democrat, you have no heart. If you are over thirty and aren't a Republican, you have no brain. Or so I've been told... -- Jim Pennino Remove -spam-sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush Pilots Fly-In. South Africa. | Bush Air | Home Built | 0 | May 25th 04 06:18 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Photographer seeking 2 pilots / warbirds for photo shoot | Wings Of Fury | Aerobatics | 0 | February 26th 04 05:59 PM |