At 22:33 05 December 2019, 2G wrote:
On Thursday, December 5, 2019 at 11:15:08 AM UTC-8, Dave Walsh wrote:
At 16:14 05 December 2019, 2KA wrote:
Yeah, the entire fleet was inspected and repaired as required=20
(years ago),
and SH paid for the whole thing. Gliders built at the factory=20
in Germany
were found to be affected, as well as those built at=20
contractors.

Lynn Alley
"2KA"
=20
You were lucky! I was in a UK owned DuoDiscus based at=20
Sisteron, France, a few years ago. Wing spar de-bonding was=20
discovered at an annual inspection even though the glider had,=20
in theory, been inspected previously, looking for this specific=20
manufacturing fault. SH DECLINED TO PAY FOR THIS REPAIR;=20
if I recall correctly each of us in the 8 man syndicate had to=20
cough up about =C2=A3700.......
Dave Walsh

This is particularly disturbing, raising the question of the
effectiveness
=
of the original inspection method(s). Do the logbook(s) detail how and
when=
this inspection was done? How did the current annual discover the
de-bondi=
ng?

Tom

The inspections were performed with an endoscope, and the full length of
the spar bonding was inspected visually. SH issued a very comprehensive
guide to the process.

Terry