View Single Post
  #1  
Old September 7th 05, 09:49 PM
Tom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
...
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:30:42 GMT, "Tom" wrote:

Nice looking aircraft, I always thought - what were they like to fly?.


Well, those that were unkind described it as "two T-28s flying
formation on dempster dumpster." :-)


LOL.. I think it looks sort of.. functional and...cute, possibly. Organic.

snip

Non-precision approaches (ADF and TACAN) were flown on BRC
(base recovery course) and you transitioned to visual and were back to
"meat ball, line up, and airspeed"); or missed approach.


Right.. was the BRC calculated so that you hopefully intercepted the
glideslope in time to transition to visual and land? i.e. a sort of gentle
lead pursuit?

Non-precision CCA or FCA (Fudd Controlled Approach) were like at the
field (fly the heading given and altitude suggested) until visual then
transion; or missed approach. Precision CCA was similar (and you
awaited "3/4 mile; call the ball") on all of them.


What was your approach speed relative to the carrier? I'm guessing 60 kts or
so.. so that's only 45 secs to sort it out.. not long if you're a bit off
and the wind's blowing!


Night IMC approaches were always good for a thrill or two.


I bet they were...

some high seas and weather minimums and you might get to "splice the
mainbrace." :-)


or the main spar!



Bill Kambic