![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:30:42 GMT, "Tom" wrote: Nice looking aircraft, I always thought - what were they like to fly?. Well, those that were unkind described it as "two T-28s flying formation on dempster dumpster." :-) LOL.. I think it looks sort of.. functional and...cute, possibly. Organic. snip Non-precision approaches (ADF and TACAN) were flown on BRC (base recovery course) and you transitioned to visual and were back to "meat ball, line up, and airspeed"); or missed approach. Right.. was the BRC calculated so that you hopefully intercepted the glideslope in time to transition to visual and land? i.e. a sort of gentle lead pursuit? Non-precision CCA or FCA (Fudd Controlled Approach) were like at the field (fly the heading given and altitude suggested) until visual then transion; or missed approach. Precision CCA was similar (and you awaited "3/4 mile; call the ball") on all of them. What was your approach speed relative to the carrier? I'm guessing 60 kts or so.. so that's only 45 secs to sort it out.. not long if you're a bit off and the wind's blowing! Night IMC approaches were always good for a thrill or two. I bet they were... some high seas and weather minimums and you might get to "splice the mainbrace." :-) or the main spar! Bill Kambic |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 20:49:58 GMT, "Tom" wrote:
Non-precision approaches (ADF and TACAN) were flown on BRC (base recovery course) and you transitioned to visual and were back to "meat ball, line up, and airspeed"); or missed approach. Right.. was the BRC calculated so that you hopefully intercepted the glideslope in time to transition to visual and land? i.e. a sort of gentle lead pursuit? I have some of the old INTREPID approach plates around in my "old stuff box." I'll see if I can find them and answer your question more accurately. Non-precision CCA or FCA (Fudd Controlled Approach) were like at the field (fly the heading given and altitude suggested) until visual then transion; or missed approach. Precision CCA was similar (and you awaited "3/4 mile; call the ball") on all of them. What was your approach speed relative to the carrier? I'm guessing 60 kts or so.. so that's only 45 secs to sort it out.. not long if you're a bit off and the wind's blowing! Normal instrument approach was flown at 105kts and 2/3 flaps, if my aging memory is correct. Wind over the deck was usually in the 25-30 kt. range on most days and nights. I'd say the ship was doing 20 kts. plus or minus about 90% of the time. The landing was made in the 2/3 flap configuration (vice the full flaps used in VMC conditions). Bill Kambic |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VP-II wings available in Oregon, USA (Or, "How I was coconuted...") | Roberto Waltman | Home Built | 2 | October 29th 04 04:21 PM |
Charging for Wings safety seminar? | Marty Shapiro | Piloting | 19 | June 23rd 04 05:28 PM |
Double covering fabric covered wings | [email protected] | Home Built | 9 | May 9th 04 08:39 PM |
Stolen "Champ" wings located...from 23,000 feet!! | Tom Pappano | Piloting | 17 | December 15th 03 01:24 PM |
Wings from "Champ" stolen in Oklahoma after emergency landing | Tom Pappano | Piloting | 1 | December 7th 03 05:02 AM |