"vincent p. norris" wrote in message
...
E&P has ZERO credibility...

That is just your personal opinion, not a fact. If it has "zero
credibility," no one would read it and it would have gone belly up
decades ago.

Like national Enquirer...?

A ridiculous comparison and you know it. E&P is read by people in
the newspaper business and they want good info about what's going on.

Uh huh!


NE is read by housewives for entertainment.

but even if true, consider the statistical sample
(hundreds of small town (i.e., quite conservative) versus the NYTiLies,
LATimes...

You've never heard of the Wall Street Journal or the Chicago Tribune?

There's two.

Two is one more than it takes to refute your implied porposition that
only small town papers are conservative.

SHow me where I said "only".

If your can't read

I could add the Greensburg
Tribune and the Harrisburg Patriot News, but I'm sure you never heard
of them. They are not published in "small towns."

That shows how little you know about American history and the
newspaper business. Go to a library and read some of those
newspapers.

I may not know the newspaper business circa 1930's and 40's, but I do
dhave
a fairly good knowledge of American history.

But you're not aware of the resistance of the business community (of
which newspapers are a part) to FDR's New Deal?

But, even more, you made my point

Only in your mind-- which was already made up. Since you know little
about the newspaper business, how would you know that E&P has "zero
credibility"? Did you have any opinion at all, or did you even know
that Editor & Publisher existed, before you read my earlier post?

And since you still haven't answered my question, instead, typically, ran
off in all different directions, engaged in massive evasions, can't follow a
point, I find it pointless to discuss anything with you.

Make your point or STFU.

You can't.