What did this guy hit??

"vincent p. norris" wrote in message
...
E&P has ZERO credibility...

That is just your personal opinion, not a fact. If it has "zero
credibility," no one would read it and it would have gone belly up
decades ago.

Like national Enquirer...?

A ridiculous comparison and you know it. E&P is read by people in
the newspaper business and they want good info about what's going on.

Uh huh!


NE is read by housewives for entertainment.

but even if true, consider the statistical sample
(hundreds of small town (i.e., quite conservative) versus the NYTiLies,
LATimes...

You've never heard of the Wall Street Journal or the Chicago Tribune?

There's two.

Two is one more than it takes to refute your implied porposition that
only small town papers are conservative.

SHow me where I said "only".

If your can't read

I could add the Greensburg
Tribune and the Harrisburg Patriot News, but I'm sure you never heard
of them. They are not published in "small towns."

That shows how little you know about American history and the
newspaper business. Go to a library and read some of those
newspapers.

I may not know the newspaper business circa 1930's and 40's, but I do
dhave
a fairly good knowledge of American history.

But you're not aware of the resistance of the business community (of
which newspapers are a part) to FDR's New Deal?

But, even more, you made my point

Only in your mind-- which was already made up. Since you know little
about the newspaper business, how would you know that E&P has "zero
credibility"? Did you have any opinion at all, or did you even know
that Editor & Publisher existed, before you read my earlier post?

And since you still haven't answered my question, instead, typically, ran
off in all different directions, engaged in massive evasions, can't follow a
point, I find it pointless to discuss anything with you.

Make your point or STFU.

You can't.

But you're not aware of the resistance of the business community (of
which newspapers are a part) to FDR's New Deal?

You haven't answered this question.

Since you know little about the newspaper business, how would you know that E&P has "zero
credibility"?

You haven't answered this question.

Did you have any opinion at all, or did you even know
that Editor & Publisher existed, before you read my earlier post?

You haven't answered this question.

Make your point or STFU.

Do you always resort to invective?

vince norris

"vincent p. norris" wrote in message
...
But you're not aware of the resistance of the business community (of
which newspapers are a part) to FDR's New Deal?

You haven't answered this question.

You haven't addressed my FIRST point, much less anything since.

Your point in response to mine about the media (specifically newspapers) was
that the majority of newspapers since 1936 endorsed the republican
presidential candidate.

So my question is: so what?


Since you know little about the newspaper business, how would you know
that E&P has "zero
credibility"?

You haven't answered this question.

As well

Did you have any opinion at all, or did you even know
that Editor & Publisher existed, before you read my earlier post?

You haven't answered this question.

As well

Make your point or STFU.

Do you always resort to invective?

Only to people in gross denial and evasion.

As typical of the MSM industry, you can't follow even the simpleist line.

Pull your head out of your barfback mindset and come back when you get a
clue.

Discussing anything with an irrational subjectivist is pointless.

Grow up!

But you're not aware of the resistance of the business community (of
which newspapers are a part) to FDR's New Deal?

You haven't answered this question.

You haven't addressed my FIRST point, much less anything since.

Your point in response to mine about the media (specifically newspapers) was
that the majority of newspapers since 1936 endorsed the republican
presidential candidate.

So my question is: so what?

I didn't recognize that as a question, despite the punctuation. It
seemed more like a smart alec remark.

The answer is: Matt Whiting said, IIRC, that the media are "liberal."
My question was, and still is, why would "liberal" media urge their
readers to vote for the Republican Presidential candidate?

I still haven't read an answer to that question. Can you answer it?
Will you?

Since you know little about the newspaper business, how would you know
that E&P has "zero
credibility"?

You haven't answered this question.

As well

Did you have any opinion at all, or did you even know
that Editor & Publisher existed, before you read my earlier post?

You haven't answered this question.

As well

Make your point or STFU.

Do you always resort to invective?

Only to people in gross denial and evasion.

As typical of the MSM industry, you can't follow even the simpleist line.

What is the MSM industry?

Pull your head out of your barfback mindset and come back when you get a
clue.

Discussing anything with an irrational subjectivist is pointless.

Grow up!

My goodness gracious! If you keep sayjng mean things like that, you
might hurt my feelings! (You know I take everything you say very
seriously!)

vince norris