View Single Post
  #22  
Old January 2nd 07, 12:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
Roy N5804F
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default GNS 430W vs GNS 480



"JD" wrote in message
ups.com...


On Jan 1, 5:39 pm, "JD" wrote:
480 is more capable (has holds, etc), but the 430 is *MUCH* easier
to use. If you are a computer geek, go with the 480. If you want easy
of flying, go with the 430. If you think you may want to fly G1000
someday, go with the 430 because the nav side is right from a 430.


-Robert, CFIII tend to disagree with Robert, I think the 480 has a more
intutive

user interface.

"Ad-hoc" holds: You can define a hold point at any user waypoint or
database point. Specify the leg lenght in mins or miles/Kilomiles
(grin), direction of turns, etc.. The 480/GPSS will drive the hold for
you.


And, also, it'll tell you what kind of entry to use, teardrop, direct,
etc..


As does the 530.

I have a real problem with your statement that the 430/530 is not enroute
certified. They are all that is fitted into the bird I fly we fly IFR all
the time.