"C.D. Damron" wrote in message
news:sk86b.368550$o%2.166125@sccrnsc02...


I only check out ANN when somebody brings it up here on RAH. In almost
every case, I see a case a questionable journalism, within moments.

Check out this blurb that appeared on ANN:

"Risky Business": Adam's A-700 Flight To Oshkosh. Barely a week after
their
totally new bird with totally new engines takes flight, Adam Aircraft
decided to bring it to Oshkosh. While many consider the move gutsy
(including our staff, begrudgingly), we consider the move questionable.
Already under fire for safety practices and other concerns, what chance
this
aircraft has of seeing the light of day (certification and production
wise)
were put into jeopardy for what we consider a PR stunt that had
questionable
value and WAY too many risks...

Is this good journalism?

No, it's an editorial. It may surprise you, but there is a difference. If
you knew the background behind those comments, you'd probably reach the same
conclusion. Have you looked for the other side of the story?

Juan