View Single Post
  #5  
Old August 14th 03, 09:21 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John R Weiss" wrote in message
news:WKR_a.146308$uu5.22441@sccrnsc04...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...

" 91.101 Applicability.
This subpart prescribes flight rules governing the operation of

aircraft within the United States and within 12 nautical miles from the

coast of
the United States."

It does NOT differentiate between civil, military, and public

aircraft.

Title 49 does and Statute rules.


"Statute rules"?!?

OK, then 49 USC specifically allows the FAA to regulate military aircraft
operations. Almost right off the bat, 49 USC 40101 par. (a)(7)(C)

mentions "the
national defense" as a target of its "regulatory system." Then par. (d)
specifically charges the "Administrator of the Federal Aviation

Administration"
with:


Come on Weiss, the words you quote explicitly exempt the Military, on a
National Defense basis, from FAA regulation. Why would you think providing
a specific exception, under Statute, would assert some sort of control?