![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John R Weiss" wrote in message news:WKR_a.146308$uu5.22441@sccrnsc04... "Tarver Engineering" wrote... " 91.101 Applicability. This subpart prescribes flight rules governing the operation of aircraft within the United States and within 12 nautical miles from the coast of the United States." It does NOT differentiate between civil, military, and public aircraft. Title 49 does and Statute rules. "Statute rules"?!? OK, then 49 USC specifically allows the FAA to regulate military aircraft operations. Almost right off the bat, 49 USC 40101 par. (a)(7)(C) mentions "the national defense" as a target of its "regulatory system." Then par. (d) specifically charges the "Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration" with: Come on Weiss, the words you quote explicitly exempt the Military, on a National Defense basis, from FAA regulation. Why would you think providing a specific exception, under Statute, would assert some sort of control? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
USAF axes the bicycle aerobics test | S. Sampson | Military Aviation | 22 | August 10th 03 03:50 AM |
FS Books USAF, Navy, Marine pilots and planes | Ken Insch | Military Aviation | 0 | July 20th 03 02:36 AM |
NZ plane lands safely with help from USAF | Jughead | Military Aviation | 0 | July 6th 03 10:23 PM |
From Col.Greg Davis USAF (ret) | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 0 | July 3rd 03 07:56 PM |