On Nov 18, 7:14*am, Franklin see_REPLY-TO_header wrote:
On Mon 17 Nov08 23:30, Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

On Nov 17, 10:23*am, Payton Byrd
wrote:
[...]

You missed the term "increasing" I'm afraid. 5.5 squared is 30.5,
which is fine for pure math, but not fine for a turning F14 with a
linear expanding g profile.
The 25 figure as stated in the assumption is correct within the
problem.

Fun isn't it?

Sir, please sir. The Ps value is far too low.

No Ps value for a turning aircraft is possible without an altitude
inclusion since the same g and a specific airspeed will produce a
different Ps at different altitudes for any turning aircraft.
Therefore a specific Ps value either positive, negative, or on the
Ps=0 line can't be assumed in the question since altitude was NOT
given.
Sorry, don't know why you are making such assumptions other than
trolling but....NO CIGAR!! :-)))

Dudley Henriques