On Sep 17, 5:48*pm, Jenny Taylor wrote:

I'm sorry, but you're incorrect, Mr./Ms. Gattman. *Stephen provided the proper definition of a runway incursion and cited its official source
from the FAA. *You can try to earn points with the debate club, but that won't change the facts. *Some news story, even cleverly excerpted, does
not replace nor supercede the FAA Orders

"Some news story?" You mean this one? http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/...m?newsId=10166

Published by the FAA? The people who make the FAA Orders? Dated July
30, 2009? Which is more recent than, say, the 2009 FAR/AIM? About a
week before the runway incursions the FAA told us were reported? The
news story at the FAA.GOV site under "fact sheets" that says "This
means that the total number of runway incursion reports increased
primarily because surface incidents are now classified as runway
incursions." That news story?

What's with the "debate club"? Are you being sarcastic now too? Why
would you do that? Is that something you would say to me in person?
Have I attacked you?

No, you are not sorry, and I'm simply quoting the same FAA website
that you're declaring authoritative. Maybe you can explain the FAA-
sourced material I quoted above or explain how I'm misinterpreting it?
Instead of tossing out some snarky-ass "debate club" comment? Maybe
not? Who ARE you?

-c