Thread: Arcus vs
View Single Post
  #5  
Old December 19th 17, 09:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dave Walsh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 83
Default Arcus vs

At 20:30 19 December 2017, wrote:
Hi,

How does Arcus compare (any and all aspects) to other

modern two seaters?
Does anyone have any experience with Arcus EL?


Very, very few electric Arcus were ever built. I know of one

that was crashed in the French Alps, it was spun-in, so that's
one less.
You may wait a long time for first hand information on the
Arcus E. However lots of generally good things are said about
the Arcus, Arcus T and Arcus M: there are lots of them at
Sisteron in the summer. The two stroke self launch Arcus M
and the Arcus E both have much higher wing loadings, opinion
on whether this is a real problem depends on who you ask.
Lots of information out there on the Lange Antares 20E/23E
electric propulsion system, this is pretty much the same as the
system in the Arcus E. In climb you've probably got 11 -13
minutes total engine run time so if you use 6 minutes climbing
out you've got 6 minutes of run time left; this is NOT going to
get you back from the far end of a failed 500K. This is probably
a significant factor for many buyers? On the plus side you have
a reliable electric motor not a complex smelly petrol engine.
I'd guess Dave Nadler would be your best source of
information.
Dave Walsh