wrote in message . com...
How?
The command to destory the naval records would have to pass several
hands between the president and the corporal that would press the
"erase" botton. Every hand along the way would be a risk factor that
could take an interest in the records just because the president wanted
them erased.

(Issac Goldberg) wrote in message . com...
Well, here is one way to do it:

July 9, 2004
Pentagon Says Bush Records of Service Were Destroyed
By RALPH BLUMENTHAL, The New York Times

It said the payroll records of "numerous service members," including
former First Lt. Bush, had been ruined in 1996 and 1997 by the Defense
Finance and Accounting Service during a project to salvage
deteriorating microfilm. No back-up paper copies could be found, it
added in notices dated June 25.

You can run such a story on 25 years old records, and 25 days old records.

You asked, "How?" And I provided you with one real life example.
LBJ could have used a similar method to have evidence destroyed in
the case of the USS Liberty attack.

Besides, in 1997 Bush was not the president,
so the interest in him was much lower.

Funny, when Bush released some of his records a number of months
ago, nothing was said of the destroyed records. Perhaps they
were not destroyed in 1997, but more recently? When you are
president, everybody is eager to follow your direct orders,
apparently, even if the orders may be illegal. It would take
a real suicidal personality to disobey a direct order from
the President of the United States. They say, "you can't
fight City Hall." In this case, it would be "you can't fight
the White House."