A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Magneto Timing Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 17th 08, 12:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dick[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Magneto Timing Question

The specs for my C-85 are upper plugs mag @ 28* BTDC and lower @ 30*BTDC.

My results are upper @ 30* BTDC and lower @ 32* BTDC.

I couldn't find a "flower pot" with attached degree wheel to borrow and
attach to the prop hub so used a little "mickey mouse" circular protractor
with a free swinging needle/pointer.

Two separate readings confirmed my 30-32. TDC was identified and impulses
unloaded before taking the readings.

My question is whether my results are acceptable for a low speed ,
experimental or need to be readjusted??

If need to be redone, I'd appreciate a little on why, please.

Thanks, Dick

PS: If listening G, I think "highflyer"(?) gave me some mag advice
during an "annual" a few years back which was appreciated.


  #2  
Old August 17th 08, 03:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Orval Fairbairn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default Magneto Timing Question

In article IMJpk.70$482.47@trnddc06, "Dick"
wrote:

The specs for my C-85 are upper plugs mag @ 28* BTDC and lower @ 30*BTDC.

My results are upper @ 30* BTDC and lower @ 32* BTDC.

I couldn't find a "flower pot" with attached degree wheel to borrow and
attach to the prop hub so used a little "mickey mouse" circular protractor
with a free swinging needle/pointer.

Two separate readings confirmed my 30-32. TDC was identified and impulses
unloaded before taking the readings.

My question is whether my results are acceptable for a low speed ,
experimental or need to be readjusted??

If need to be redone, I'd appreciate a little on why, please.

Thanks, Dick

PS: If listening G, I think "highflyer"(?) gave me some mag advice
during an "annual" a few years back which was appreciated.


Since you are probably using 100LL in an 80 octane engine, you are
probably just going to get a little more than 85 HP, with no damage.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.
  #3  
Old August 17th 08, 08:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dale Scroggins[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default Magneto Timing Question


"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article IMJpk.70$482.47@trnddc06, "Dick"
wrote:

The specs for my C-85 are upper plugs mag @ 28* BTDC and lower @ 30*BTDC.

My results are upper @ 30* BTDC and lower @ 32* BTDC.

I couldn't find a "flower pot" with attached degree wheel to borrow and
attach to the prop hub so used a little "mickey mouse" circular
protractor
with a free swinging needle/pointer.

Two separate readings confirmed my 30-32. TDC was identified and impulses
unloaded before taking the readings.

My question is whether my results are acceptable for a low speed ,
experimental or need to be readjusted??

If need to be redone, I'd appreciate a little on why, please.

Thanks, Dick

PS: If listening G, I think "highflyer"(?) gave me some mag advice
during an "annual" a few years back which was appreciated.


Since you are probably using 100LL in an 80 octane engine, you are
probably just going to get a little more than 85 HP, with no damage.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.


Please reconsider your response. Detonation is not the only concern. These
old Continentals can built up of parts of unknown age, condition, and
history. Even when new, these engines didn't handle high cylinder pressures
very well. So even if the cylinder pressures are not high enough to cause
detonation with 100LL, they can still be high enough to pull cylinder base
studs out of the case, crack cylinder heads, hammer main bearings, and flex
or distort crankcases over time.

I'm not sure the OP's method for checking timing is accurate, but if his mag
timing is in fact 2 degrees advanced, it should be reset to the values on
the data plate.

  #4  
Old August 18th 08, 12:08 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dick[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Magneto Timing Question

Dale,
If OP means original poster, that is me. For the record, my timing is 2 deg
more advanced but still BTDC by 32 deg. After an A&P rebuilt and installed
my mags about 100 hours ago, I'm not sure if they were installed per the
manual spec 30 deg or the 32 deg I found by test recently. A different A&P
doesn't have a problem with it either way.

I any case, I am just curious about any range established per "rule of
thumb", experience or paracticality..

Thanks for taking the time to give your opinion.


"Dale Scroggins" wrote in message
...

"Orval Fairbairn" wrote in message
news
In article IMJpk.70$482.47@trnddc06, "Dick"
wrote:

The specs for my C-85 are upper plugs mag @ 28* BTDC and lower @
30*BTDC.

My results are upper @ 30* BTDC and lower @ 32* BTDC.

I couldn't find a "flower pot" with attached degree wheel to borrow and
attach to the prop hub so used a little "mickey mouse" circular
protractor
with a free swinging needle/pointer.

Two separate readings confirmed my 30-32. TDC was identified and
impulses
unloaded before taking the readings.

My question is whether my results are acceptable for a low speed ,
experimental or need to be readjusted??

If need to be redone, I'd appreciate a little on why, please.

Thanks, Dick

PS: If listening G, I think "highflyer"(?) gave me some mag advice
during an "annual" a few years back which was appreciated.


Since you are probably using 100LL in an 80 octane engine, you are
probably just going to get a little more than 85 HP, with no damage.

--
Remove _'s from email address to talk to me.


Please reconsider your response. Detonation is not the only concern.
These old Continentals can built up of parts of unknown age, condition,
and history. Even when new, these engines didn't handle high cylinder
pressures very well. So even if the cylinder pressures are not high
enough to cause detonation with 100LL, they can still be high enough to
pull cylinder base studs out of the case, crack cylinder heads, hammer
main bearings, and flex or distort crankcases over time.

I'm not sure the OP's method for checking timing is accurate, but if his
mag timing is in fact 2 degrees advanced, it should be reset to the values
on the data plate.



  #5  
Old August 18th 08, 02:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dale Scroggins[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default Magneto Timing Question


"Dick" wrote in message
news:2c2qk.130$p72.75@trnddc05...
Dale,
If OP means original poster, that is me. For the record, my timing is 2
deg more advanced but still BTDC by 32 deg. After an A&P rebuilt and
installed my mags about 100 hours ago, I'm not sure if they were installed
per the manual spec 30 deg or the 32 deg I found by test recently. A
different A&P
doesn't have a problem with it either way.

I any case, I am just curious about any range established per "rule of
thumb", experience or paracticality..

Thanks for taking the time to give your opinion.


snip

I can't give you a rule of thumb. I can pass along an informed opinion
developed over the last thirty years as aircraft mechanic, with several
thousand hours of that spent working on small Continentals.

1. You shouldn't run your timing more advanced than specified. Two degrees
is too much excess advance for your engine; 30 degrees advance is a lot of
advance for an engine that turns about 2,000 rpm most of the time.
Continental specified 30 degrees to get good performance at a cost in
durability. When I set mag timing, I'm happy only when it's within 1/2 a
degree. But I would worry if it were 1/2 a degree too much advance on a
small Continental.

If the mechanic who put the mag on set it right to begin with, then your
points are wearing faster than the cam rubbing block, and the timing will
continue to advance as you fly. And the e-gap, or internal mag timing, is
drifting too. If the timing shifted 2 degrees in 100 hours, you have
something wearing too fast.

How, if you could not see the prop flange markings, did you establish TDC?
Are you fully confident that the advance is 30 and 32 degrees? By the way,
if you can see the flange markings from the top, but not the bottom, you
could time the mags using a cylinder other than #1. The second A&P may have
doubts about your methods. How did the first A&P set the timing; could he
see the prop flange markings, or did he use a timing wheel? The wheels can
be inaccurate if improperly set up or if the pointer friction is excessive.

2. How old are your cylinder heads? Not since overhaul, not since cylinder
barrel replacement, but since the heads were new? Have they ever been
welded? How old is your case? How many hours total time? Who did the
overhaul, and what was the condition of the mating surfaces and bearing
journals? Continental hasn't made a C85 in quite a number of years, and
advancing the timing a couple of degrees, especially from a fairly advanced
setting to begin with, will result in significantly higher cylinder
pressures. Are all your engine parts up to that?

The questions I asked above would be questions I would have in making the
decision to reset the timing. But, in the end, I would probably use the
time-rite or timing wheel and recheck the mag timing. If it had any excess
advance I would reset the timing. If it had two degrees excess advance, I
would pull off the point covers and look at the points.







  #6  
Old August 18th 08, 12:35 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dick[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Magneto Timing Question

Dale,
Thanks for the additional thoughts. Bottom line: I'll recheck my technique
and the points before "bumping" the mags.

Thanks again, Dick




"Dale Scroggins" wrote in message
news

"Dick" wrote in message
news:2c2qk.130$p72.75@trnddc05...
Dale,
If OP means original poster, that is me. For the record, my timing is 2
deg more advanced but still BTDC by 32 deg. After an A&P rebuilt and
installed my mags about 100 hours ago, I'm not sure if they were
installed per the manual spec 30 deg or the 32 deg I found by test
recently. A different A&P
doesn't have a problem with it either way.

I any case, I am just curious about any range established per "rule of
thumb", experience or paracticality..

Thanks for taking the time to give your opinion.


snip

I can't give you a rule of thumb. I can pass along an informed opinion
developed over the last thirty years as aircraft mechanic, with several
thousand hours of that spent working on small Continentals.

1. You shouldn't run your timing more advanced than specified. Two
degrees is too much excess advance for your engine; 30 degrees advance is
a lot of advance for an engine that turns about 2,000 rpm most of the
time. Continental specified 30 degrees to get good performance at a cost
in durability. When I set mag timing, I'm happy only when it's within 1/2
a degree. But I would worry if it were 1/2 a degree too much advance on a
small Continental.

If the mechanic who put the mag on set it right to begin with, then your
points are wearing faster than the cam rubbing block, and the timing will
continue to advance as you fly. And the e-gap, or internal mag timing, is
drifting too. If the timing shifted 2 degrees in 100 hours, you have
something wearing too fast.

How, if you could not see the prop flange markings, did you establish TDC?
Are you fully confident that the advance is 30 and 32 degrees? By the
way, if you can see the flange markings from the top, but not the bottom,
you could time the mags using a cylinder other than #1. The second A&P
may have doubts about your methods. How did the first A&P set the timing;
could he see the prop flange markings, or did he use a timing wheel? The
wheels can be inaccurate if improperly set up or if the pointer friction
is excessive.

2. How old are your cylinder heads? Not since overhaul, not since
cylinder barrel replacement, but since the heads were new? Have they ever
been welded? How old is your case? How many hours total time? Who did
the overhaul, and what was the condition of the mating surfaces and
bearing journals? Continental hasn't made a C85 in quite a number of
years, and advancing the timing a couple of degrees, especially from a
fairly advanced setting to begin with, will result in significantly higher
cylinder pressures. Are all your engine parts up to that?

The questions I asked above would be questions I would have in making the
decision to reset the timing. But, in the end, I would probably use the
time-rite or timing wheel and recheck the mag timing. If it had any
excess advance I would reset the timing. If it had two degrees excess
advance, I would pull off the point covers and look at the points.










  #7  
Old August 22nd 08, 01:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Charles Vincent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 170
Default Magneto Timing Question

Dale Scroggins wrote:

How did the first A&P
set the timing; could he see the prop flange markings, or did he use a
timing wheel? The wheels can be inaccurate if improperly set up or if
the pointer friction is excessive.


I used to have a nifty device that installed into the plug hole on the
number one cylinder. It had a probe and a set of cards(each had marks
for several engines) that installed on it that would directly read the
cylinder position. The device was entirely mechanical and had a very
well made wooden box for a case. I inherited it and sold it years ago
since I wasn't likely to ever work on an R-2800 (most of the cards were
for big radials, but lycoming and continental were well represented as
well) I expected that it was probably standard kit for A&Ps

Charles
  #8  
Old August 17th 08, 12:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Stealth Pilot[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 846
Default Magneto Timing Question

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:54:16 GMT, "Dick" wrote:

The specs for my C-85 are upper plugs mag @ 28* BTDC and lower @ 30*BTDC.

My results are upper @ 30* BTDC and lower @ 32* BTDC.

I couldn't find a "flower pot" with attached degree wheel to borrow and
attach to the prop hub so used a little "mickey mouse" circular protractor
with a free swinging needle/pointer.

Two separate readings confirmed my 30-32. TDC was identified and impulses
unloaded before taking the readings.

My question is whether my results are acceptable for a low speed ,
experimental or need to be readjusted??

If need to be redone, I'd appreciate a little on why, please.


not sure of the C-85 but on the O-200 there are cylinders out there
made before a subtle design change was implemented that have a history
of departing the engine on engines with advanced timing.
my own engine has four of those early cylinders and so runs with
timing a little retarded from what it could be. (as per the AD)
if it need be done that may be why.

Stealth Pilot


  #9  
Old August 17th 08, 04:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Magneto Timing Question

On Aug 16, 5:54 pm, "Dick" wrote:

I couldn't find a "flower pot" with attached degree wheel to borrow and
attach to the prop hub so used a little "mickey mouse" circular protractor
with a free swinging needle/pointer.


There should be timing marks on the prop flange. They'll be
on the bottom when the #1 cylinder is at TDC, and you line them up
with the crankcase seam. Shouldn't need the other timing doodad, which
isn't all that accurate.

Dan
  #10  
Old August 17th 08, 04:47 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Dick[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 71
Default Magneto Timing Question

yes there are timing marks. Unfortunately I can't access the case seam due
to nosebowl and air plenum sheetmetal that I'd prefer not removing.

So I guess my question still remains on difference between 30/32 and
28/30...

Thanks anyway, Dick
wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 5:54 pm, "Dick" wrote:

I couldn't find a "flower pot" with attached degree wheel to borrow and
attach to the prop hub so used a little "mickey mouse" circular
protractor
with a free swinging needle/pointer.


There should be timing marks on the prop flange. They'll be
on the bottom when the #1 cylinder is at TDC, and you line them up
with the crankcase seam. Shouldn't need the other timing doodad, which
isn't all that accurate.

Dan



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MAGNETO TIMING LIGHT Plans Roger Owning 4 November 16th 05 05:24 PM
MAGNETO TIMING LIGHT Plans Roger Piloting 4 November 13th 05 07:50 PM
Bendix Magneto Question Dick Kurtz Owning 0 September 22nd 05 03:36 AM
Bendix Magneto Question Dick Kurtz Restoration 0 September 22nd 05 03:36 AM
internal timing of slick magneto Jerry Jensen Home Built 1 June 25th 04 07:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.