ATC

buttman wrote in news:6d3f93e4-36c8-4d9f-b4fd-
:

On Mar 31, 9:25*am, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:58 am, buttman wrote:

Right, but on one occasion, I remember hearing a controller ask a
pilot if he had the weather and NOTAMS for a particular airport he
was
intending to do a practice approach at. The pilot responded that he
had the weather, but not the NOTAMS. The controller made him do a
few
holds until he had a chance to bring up the NOTAMS to read to him.
The
reason for the NOTAM was the one and only runway was closed. I'm
not a
controller, but I'm pretty sure there is a rule that states a plane
can't be cleared for an approach until the controller is sure the
pilot has all the relevant information, including weather and
notams.

I am a controller, there is no such rule.

Well then it's an unwritten rule.

No it isn't you fjukktard.


You should be notamed as an aerial hazard.


Bertie

On Mar 31, 9:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should be notamed as an aerial hazard.

Bertie

No fair making me laugh apple juice through my nose!!

Dan wrote in news:e63ed356-1a95-4b86-81d7-a36b3815c016
@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

On Mar 31, 9:06 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
You should be notamed as an aerial hazard.

Bertie

No fair making me laugh apple juice through my nose!!



I do that.

bertie

On Mar 31, 6:40 pm, buttman wrote:

Well then it's an unwritten rule. I've witnesses a bunch of times a
controller refusing to clear a IFR plane further until the pilot has
verified he has weather and NOTAMS.


Probably the same controller each time.