![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK...I am not the original poster...at present I do not own a
sailplane...just a powered expermental airplane. *I didn't realize it was apparently fairly easy (???) to ask the FAA to change from a standard to experimental airworthiness certificate. *Maybe I will see if I can get our Cessna 140 into the experimental class so I can do more owner maint/mods Scott, you are apparently confusing Experimental Homebuilt (where the original builder can maintain "his" plane) with Experimental Racing and Exhibition, which is the catagory many gliders are registered in. No way you can change your 140 to Ex-homebuilt, but you could probably change it to EX-Racing and Exhibition. I'll leave it to smarter people than I to explain the difference. Kirk 66 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 16:39 20 November 2010, Scott Alexander wrote:
A friend in my club built a pair of winglets for his Standard Cirrus. His glider is expirmental, mine is not. The total cost for him was just a hundred dollars for supplies, and some free guidance from a local IA/AP. The finished product looks fantastic! The mold came from an American Spirit, which I believe is a copy of the Ventus. And the result is that his handling has improved quite a bit. He did do some adjustments on the toe-out angle to fine tune it which supposively helped. I would like to do the same thing with mine using the exact same molds. My Cirrus is a standard airworthiness certificate. If I were to do the factory winglet or the Maughmer winglet, the cost is between 3,000-5,000 when it's all said and done. So that being said, this option, looks very appealing. Has anyone in this group dealt with the same sort of deal? I would be willing to change my standard airworthiness certificate over to an expiremental if that is the best solution. Any guidance is much appreciated. Thanks, Scott PS Happy Thanksgiving. If it was me, Id go with the factory, or atlest the STC. Remember, the value of the glider will probably rise as much as invested. Maby im wrong, but maby the valu will be lower than now when in experimental alternative. How would u think if you was a intrested buyer of that glider? Im sure youre friends winglets improved handeling. But Im also sure factory or Maughmer performes even better!! Its just much more engineering and testing behind it!! It might be cheaper in the end, when you want to sell for upgrading to a Discus2!! =) Just a thouhgt. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 24, 1:20*pm, Johan Nykvist wrote:
At 16:39 20 November 2010, Scott Alexander wrote: A friend in my club built a pair of winglets for his Standard Cirrus. His glider is expirmental, mine is not. *The total cost for him was just a hundred dollars for supplies, and some free guidance from a local IA/AP. *The finished product looks fantastic! *The mold came from an American Spirit, which I believe is a copy of the Ventus. *And the result is that his handling has improved quite a bit. *He did do some adjustments on the toe-out angle to fine tune it which supposively helped. I would like to do the same thing with mine using the exact same molds. *My Cirrus is a standard airworthiness certificate. *If I were to do the factory winglet or the Maughmer winglet, the cost is between 3,000-5,000 when it's all said and done. *So that being said, this option, looks very appealing. Has anyone in this group dealt with the same sort of deal? *I would be willing to change my standard airworthiness certificate over to an expiremental if that is the best solution. *Any guidance is much appreciated. Thanks, Scott PS Happy Thanksgiving. If it was me, Id go with the factory, or atlest the STC. *Remember, the value of the glider will probably rise as much as invested. Maby im wrong, but maby the valu will be lower than now when in experimental alternative. *How would u think if you was a intrested buyer of that glider? Im sure youre friends winglets improved handeling. But Im also sure factory or Maughmer performes even better!! *Its just much more engineering and testing behind it!! * It might be cheaper in the end, when you want to sell for upgrading to a Discus2!! =) Just a thouhgt. There are no STCs. So the aftermarket winglets on certified gliders must be being done via a 337. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA Revoking Standard Airworthiness Certificate DG-505 | NG | Soaring | 32 | February 16th 17 02:23 PM |
Airworthiness Certificate Replacement? | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | June 26th 08 07:11 PM |
USA Glider Experimental Airworthiness Certificate | charlie foxtrot | Soaring | 4 | April 15th 06 05:04 AM |
Exhibition/Racing Airworthiness Certificate Question | bsquared | Soaring | 5 | June 22nd 04 06:24 PM |
Airworthiness Directives for Jantar Standard 3 | Miguel Lavalle | Soaring | 5 | January 24th 04 10:55 AM |