![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steven P. McNicoll writes: [ L-1011 vs. DC-10 #2 engine placement ] It wasn't a matter of not having room for the boom operator, it was the effect on the receiving aircraft. The RAF has used Tristar tankers for years. They use the U.S. Navy-style probe and drogue refueling system, which, if I remember correctly, appears to place receiving aircraft at least as close to the #2 engine exhaust stream as the boom system would've. Geoff -- "While everyone was delighted that P.J. had finally spoken his first words, 'Give me back my zweiback, cock-gobbler' was eventually deemed unfit for the baby book." -- lizmo the Wonder Horse |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What causes the BANG when an airliner lifts off? | G Farris | Instrument Flight Rules | 6 | January 5th 05 03:42 PM |
WTB: first-class seats and interior panels from airliner | dt | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 04 10:01 PM |
Maximum Speed of Airliner At Low Altitude | Roger Helbig | Military Aviation | 26 | June 22nd 04 04:57 PM |
Airliner manuals and brochures for sale | Martin Bayer | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | April 24th 04 09:33 PM |
World's worst airplane disaster | Mike | Military Aviation | 5 | December 10th 03 11:08 AM |