![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Mike Noel"
wrote: I have suspected for a while that my old analog tach was lying to me. My Archer's static RPM at take-off was measuring about 22k and the minimum spec was 2325, but the plane seemed to have good cruise speed. When I pointed an optical tach through the windshield I read a static RPM of 23.4K. At cruise, 25K on the analog tach translated to 25.8K on the digital tach. Any suggestions for a replacement digital instrument? It would be nice to drop it into the old tach's mounting and possibly get a few more functions from the same piece of real estate. originally posted 6 May 2003: After spending some time troubleshooting an oscillating tach needle, I decided to put in a digital tach in my cherokee. There appeared to be two choices, a Horizon Instruments digital tach, and an Electronic Instruments digital tach. Both are STC'd for a cherokee 140, but neither STC specifically covered a cherokee 140 with a 160 hp engine (the RAM Aircraft 160hp STC requires the tach to be re-marked). I believe that both cost about the same and both have simple electrical installation. I decided to install the Electronic Instruments R-1 digital tach primarily because, after talking with both EI and Horizon, I thought the 377 approval would be easier with the EI R-1. It turns out that there was no particular advantage to installing the R-1 from an approval point-of-view. Getting the FSDO and IA approval was pretty easy. Approving the P-1000 would not have been more difficult. The installation was easy, except that the EI R-1 tach doesn't fit in the "normal" tach hole. The R-1 tach is deeper than the original tach and makes contact with the top of the brake handle. As a result, I had to swap around the GEM 602, digital OAT display, and the tach. Not hard to do, but still a pain. Bottomline: The R-1 works fine. But I think the Horizon P-1000 digital tach would probably have been better since, I believe, it fits in exactly the same hole (at least a couple of other cherokees didn't have an issue installing it). Also, the P1000 will annunciate a bad mag, which the R-1 does not. you can google for the entire thread. -- Bob Noel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mechanical tach failure? | Rich S. | Home Built | 25 | November 6th 04 03:30 PM |
Wayward Tach | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 7 | February 6th 04 01:27 AM |
Tach Vs. Hobbs Time | John Roncallo | Owning | 33 | January 7th 04 12:42 AM |
Need new PA28 tach | Michael Isaksen | Owning | 2 | October 2nd 03 03:27 PM |
TKM MX-11 Com true slide replacement ? | Rohit Fedane | Owning | 0 | September 21st 03 05:02 PM |