|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#14
December 21st 03, 06:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:7oiFb.618964$Fm2.558042@attbi_s04...
With built-in flight timers becoming the norm in virtually all new avionics (heck, even the new transponder I'm getting has one), just wondering if folks are migrating away from using hobbs/tach time to record their flight time? I can't think of any reason to stop using the hobbs. I don't have to leave the avionics on after the flight to check the GPS time, the hobbs is always right there as I'm closing the door. I also use my hobbs to track the time I've spend on each tank (even though I have an EDM fuel flow computer). The hobbs seems like a perfect, simple device. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
| Instrument Rating Checkride PASSED (Very Long) | Alan Pendley | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | December 16th 04 02:16 PM |
| p3/95 | [email protected] | Military Aviation | 1 | September 27th 04 12:27 AM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Threaded Mode