![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Sixkiller" wrote
Serious accident rates (IB) are down...minor accident rates are up. What's the difference between serious and minor? Serious accidents are those that result in fatalities and hospitalizations; minor accidents only cause property damage. Lots of accidents that would have been serious 50 years ago are now minor, because 50 years ago frames were rigid and transmitted impact directly to the occupants, seat belts were rarely used, and airbags didn't exist. Getting impaled on a steering column in a low speed collision was common. Quite often, accidents were fatal yet the cars were repaired and back on the road in days. These days, nobody will design a steering system that will impale you on the column, seat belt use is common, airbags are near-universal, crumple zones are the norm, and in general the car is dramatically safer. These days if you are killed in an accident, you can be certain nobody will ever drive your car again. Having the car totalled with no injuries to the occupants is more the norm than the exception. Other improvements have been made as well. Today's cars handle dramatically better, which should allow people to steer around accidents, stay on the road in wetter conditions, etc. Brake systems are dramatically more effective and reliable. Drunk driving laws have grown teeth. We should be having fewer accidents. We're not. People simply drive more agressively. They follow closer, drive faster in worse weather, stay at the party later and drive home fatigued (but legally sober), and in every possible way circumvent all the safety regulations. The only things that work to improve safety are measures that make the accident more survivable. As well as several others factors outside of technology. Technology should make them _cheaper_. Only if they had the same capability. All the mandated safety improvements have inevitably raised the costs. The crumple zones haven't helped - not only do they cost money to put in, but they cause expensive damage in even low-speed collisions. Collision insurance rates are up in real dollars. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
North Korea Denounces US Stealth Bomber Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 2nd 04 09:20 PM |
Cirrus SR22 Purchase advice needed. | Dennis | Owning | 170 | May 19th 04 04:44 PM |
Cirrus BRS deployment | Dan Luke | Piloting | 37 | April 14th 04 02:28 PM |
C-130 Unit Completes Two Year Deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 30th 03 10:04 PM |
Airmen gear up for another 120-day deployment | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 24th 03 12:04 AM |